Judge Dismisses $20 Billion Racial Discrimination Lawsuit Against Al Sharpton and Comcast

Atlanta Black Star ^ | August 14, 2015 | Donte Slocum

[MeshugeMikey]

Revrunt Al have dodged the bullet again...but the game aint OVUH YET

[doc1019]

Tru dat

[PROCON]

The good Rev knows when and where to play the race card...

[smokingfrog]

Is that billion with a ‘B’ ?

[VerySadAmerican]

A friend of mine sent me this today.

A young black kid ask his Mother, Mama what’s Socialism and Racism?”

“Well son, Socialism is when white folks work every day so we can get all our benefits. You know, like free cell phones for each family member, rent subsidy, food stamps, EMC, free healthcare, utility subsidy, free computers and Internet connection, free food, free clothing, free gifts at Christmas, and on and on, you know? That’s Socialism”.

“But Mama, don’t the white people get mad about that?”

“Sure they do son, that’s called Racism!”

[MeshugeMikey]

thats what the article say hey!!

Perhaps had they chosen to aim for 20 Million the judge may not have been so hasty as to dismiss

[MeshugeMikey]

Al got that race thang down PAT!!!

EVUHTHANG is RACESS!!!

[setha]

So it’s only racist if his side is maligned?

[MeshugeMikey]

thats right.....al worked out a deal where he owns the RIGHTS to awl things RACESS!!!

[sparklite2]

” the defendants were unable to come up with any evidence to prove their claims of racial discrimination.”
_____________________________________
Poor old reporter, not to mention his editors, doesn’t
know the difference between plaintiff and defendant.

[MeshugeMikey]

such are the mindsets of the media who tail Revrunt Sharpton

[sparklite2]

Since they are their homies constitute ninety-five percent of defendants in criminal courts, the may think “defendant” is just what you call someone in court. It’s what you do.

[martin_fierro]

California Senior U.S. District Judge Terry Hatter Jr. was very terse in his ruling, stating that the defendants were unable to come up with any evidence to prove their claims of racial discrimination.

Huh? He means plaintiffs, right? What am I missing here.

[martin_fierro]

‘Zackly.

[MeshugeMikey]

the writers been smoking the same stuff that jesse and revrunt al favor apparently

[MeshugeMikey]

ahahahahaha BEEENGO!!

[Syncro]

A few weeks after his MSNBC show, PoliticsNation with Al Sharpton, was spared from the chopping block

WHAT??

Man, that boy gots some heavy duty affirmative action goin' fo him!

I guess his dozens of visits to his "baby daddy" in the White House have paid off.

I was hoping he was gonna get the ax.

(Doesn't he owe millions in back taxes. Oh that's right, he's not Willie Nelson)

Who they gonna throw unner the bus, Maddow?

The les beans will be all over them (not in a good way) fo dat!

[MeshugeMikey]

when Obie is forced out of the Whitehouse...and the Just Us Department is replaced by a Justice Department....Revrunt Sharpton will have some HEAVY DUES to pay!

[Crystal Palace East]

Either this Amish Owned paper, or its he writers, or the judge isn’t too smart, when in the 4th sentence they don’t know it would have been the plaintiffs who would have to have proved discriminating, not the defense.!

Screw this stupid court, I’m takin’ all my cases to the Kingfish Court!

[nathanbedford]

Evidence? We don't need no stinkin' evidence! What about disparate impact?

Okay, different areas but the point is we have "disparate" application of these laws.