Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lockheed Martin's Littoral Combat Ship Is Finally Making Headway -- but Is It Too Late?
Motley Fool ^ | August 1st, 2015 | Katie Spence

Posted on 08/01/2015 9:12:31 AM PDT by Mariner

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last
To: CodeToad

New BBs would have rail guns with precision projectiles, 150-400 nm when scaled up. That would be serious force projection.

Your idea of not having anything, “because WWIII”. Was first voiced in 1946. We’ve fought a hell of a lot of conventional battles sense then. Almost all required Naval support.

Paratroopers die after 3 days without heavy forces to relieve them. You couldn’t possibly put forces in place, let alone keep them supplied, by air alone. And merchants won’t survive without a navy.


81 posted on 08/01/2015 7:31:37 PM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
"Maneuverable Nuclear Warheads"

That means we win.

Wihtin an hour 550 Minuteman III and 48 Trident's are headed to the dumb bastards that though they could take out a US Capital ship with a nuke.

82 posted on 08/01/2015 7:38:46 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18 - Be The Leaderless Resistance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Who just sent our way their missiles and warheads. No one wins. Checkmate. The next world war isn’t going to be played out on remote islands and foreign soils. In that one we take a beating too.


83 posted on 08/01/2015 7:51:48 PM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
I remember a serious discussion back and forth in the Naval Institute Professional Magazine Proceedings back in the late 70s about sub-kiloton nuclear torpedoes.

The point was that they were so small would not trigger a nuclear exchange and yet could kill an Akula with a near miss without significant radioactive waste.

"Ceterum censeo 0bama esse delendam."

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)

LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

84 posted on 08/01/2015 8:06:24 PM PDT by LonePalm (Commander and Chef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
"The next world war isn’t going to be played out on remote islands and foreign soils"

Of course it's not.

But there's a tremendous range of options to assert and project power without nukes.

All countries know our nukes work. Every time.

Why would they be so stupid as to escalate to such a point because we shot down 84 of their aircraft trying to take out our Battle Group?

85 posted on 08/01/2015 8:16:18 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18 - Be The Leaderless Resistance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: GreyHoundSailor

Ships Company ‘86-’88. I’m waiting for “mariner” to give me the Nimitz’s armor details. He said it has none.


86 posted on 08/02/2015 7:29:39 AM PDT by tupac (the crux of the biscuit is the apostrophe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat

What you say makes sense. The LCS diagram sure seemed to have little in the way of crew quarters. It looks to my untrained eye mostly like a very expensive, glorified patrol boat.
It probably has some good uses but for first line fighting or defending it looks woefully inadequate.
This is what comes of politicians being in charge of technical warfare matters.


87 posted on 08/02/2015 11:05:30 AM PDT by citizen (America is-or was-The Great Melting Pot. JEB won't even speak American in his own home. NO Bush!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: citizen
It looks to my untrained eye mostly like a very expensive, glorified patrol boat.

Yes, but it can do 50 knots.

88 posted on 08/02/2015 7:07:36 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Palins are better parents than Clintons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson