Posted on 07/27/2015 5:33:58 PM PDT by JeepersFreepers
However --- other than bad and fraudulent stewardship of contributor's money --- the even more morally objectionable part of their activities is the hostile surveillance, and physical destruction, of medically needy children of whom they claim to be benefactors..
What’s next? PETA is going to open a KFC franchise?
Translation of March’s mealy-mouthed alibi:
We send big bucks to PP because it’s the chic thing to do these days. WE want to belong to the IN crowd as much as anyone. How would we get invited to the RIGHT cocktail parties is we’re not on the cutting edge? (No pun intended).
George Grant, in his mid 80s book, Grand Illusions: The Legacy of Planned Parenthood, wrote about the then tight connection tween MoD & PP.
Grant also highlighted how the MoD's emphasis on amniocentesis was essentially a "search and destroy" mission...that the way to "root out" the disabled was to find them in the womb & kill 'em off.
After all, before prenatal surgeries became common, any disabilities uncovered in the womb in the 80s and 90s didn't lend themselves to any healing of those disabilities within the womb. (And it's still true with most early disabilities today) So the implied "what you do with a disability discovery" was to abort.
I give to one charity and one charity only, THE SALVATION ARMY!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.