Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SHOCK: More black babies aborted than born in New York City
The American Mirror ^ | JULY 21, 2015 | OLAF EKBERG

Posted on 07/21/2015 2:07:44 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: MinorityRepublican

This is devastating.

Only in the group aged 30-39 were more black babies even BORN THAN ABORTED.

In all groups from age 15-19, most pregnancies were aborted. We need to do better for all of our girls.i don’t know what the answer is, Maybe we mothers of young girls need to stress more birth control over abstinence, but for sure we need to step in and say that we will help our daughters raise their children while they go to school or work. Otherwise they will kill our grandchildren. Whatever we are doing now is not working.

Back to our black sisters. WHAT IS UP, WOMEN??? Even mature and over 20, and again over 39, you are choosing to kill your babies rather than let them live. The whole country needs to understand what is going on. Are you choosing? Are you following orders from a guy? Are you afraid of something? Is it financial, convenience? Are you having too much unprotected sex with random people? What is up with you women?

This is a major societal problem. We are all in this together for the under 19 pregnant girls. We need to help them have decent choices.

But black women of nearly all ages need to think about what they are doing. They are putting sex with men in front of the life of their children. How to change this priority? Why is this happening to black women but not Pacific Islanders, Latinas, whites?


21 posted on 07/21/2015 6:28:46 PM PDT by Yaelle (Trump is the Political Plumber, flushing out the PC sewer. So what if we see a little butt crack?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
Well looking at it with a "half glass full" perspective, that's 29,007 future Democrat voters and welfare recipients we won't have to worry about.

According to Freakonomics, that's why the crime rate went down after peaking in early '90s

22 posted on 07/21/2015 9:14:43 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kabar

I think the public in general is against abortion, as most elections and polls show. Only the blacks seem oblivious to what destruction is being wrought in their own populace.


23 posted on 07/22/2015 3:34:35 AM PDT by wbarmy (I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
According to Freakonomics, that's why the crime rate went down after peaking in early '90s

I've had conversations with certain conservatives about whether they would support a reduction in the Welfare State, if as a short-term consequence it meant that the abortion rate would probably go up. The question makes them uncomfortable and I don't get many answers.

24 posted on 07/22/2015 3:47:19 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

The legacy of Margaret Sanger, and the party of the slavery, the KKK, the segregation and mass abortion of Black and latinos unborn babies.

THE NEGRO PROJECT
POOR, BLACK & “UNDESIRABLE”

LEARN MORE ABOUT THE 1939 PLANNED PARENTHOOD INITIATIVE

http://www.toomanyaborted.com/thenegroproject/

The Negro Project was initiated in 1939 by Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood. It was a collaborative effort between the American Birth Control League and Sanger’s Birth Control Clinical Research Bureau.1 For a eugenist, it wasn’t controversial, it was integral to the implementation of eugenics to eliminate the ‘unfit’.

Eugenics is “a science that deals with the improvement (as by control of human mating) of hereditary qualities of a race or breed”.2 Negative eugenics focused on preventing the birth of those it considered inferior or unfit. This was the foundation of Sanger’s Birth Control Policy and advocated throughout her writings, speeches, and her periodicals including “Pivot of Civilization”, “Plan for Peace” and countless Birth Control Review articles.

The pseudo-science (racial hygiene theory) of negative eugenics influenced social policy and eugenics-based legislation (Immigration Act of 19243, segregation laws, sterilization laws) and led to the racial hygiene theory adopted by the Nazis.

Noted eugenist, Eugen Fischer, who was funded by The Rockefeller Foundation (one of many same organizations that also financially supported Sanger’s work), was responsible for the Nazi adoption of racial hygiene theory at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute that led to the eugenics implementation of the holocaust.4

The connection between American Eugenics and the horrors of Nazi Germany are irrefutable. The preponderance of evidence of where Sanger wanted to go (although she decried the atrocities of the holocaust after WWII) shows the ignorance and naivete of eugenics philosophy and its eventual conclusion, left undeterred. The Negro Project was but a precursor to what eugenists wanted to implement on a much larger scale.

“The main objectives of the [proposed] Population Congress is to…apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is already tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring.” – Margaret Sanger, “Plan for Peace”, 1932 Senate hearing5

MAAFA21 is a powerful documentary that exposes the eugenic racism of Planned Parenthood. Watch it, free, online at www.Maafa21.com

This is the same Sanger who persuaded a few reluctant, yet incredibly influential, black ministers to join in her Birth Control movement. To dispel the rising doubts among those who objected to Birth Control on religious and moral grounds, Sanger wrote that “the ministers work is also important…offering to train him in their ideals because “we do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members”.

Many use this statement to bolster the claim that Sanger wanted to exterminate all of the black population, but this statement is about reducing a certain type of black individual that Sanger believed should be eliminated, sterilized, or segregated onto farms.

Those who were poor and (supposedly) less intelligent. Eugenists believed the entirety of the black population were intellectually and racially inferior. (Sanger’s ideological agreement and written/spoken solidarity with the eugenics movements does throw legitimate doubt on whether it was only a segment of the black population that was being targeted.)

With the help of elite and famous African-Americans Mary McLeod Bethune, W.E.B. DuBois, and Rev. Adam Clayton Powell, Sr., the Negro Project was able to be sold as a solution to poverty and high birth rates. It is crucial, however, to understand this endeavor in conjunction with Sanger’s dominant efforts of ‘eliminating the unfit’ and her hatred of charitable organizations.

She devotes an entire chapter on charities and how those who finance them “are dropping millions into rosewater philanthropies and charities that are silly at best and vicious at worst.”

“Organized charity itself is the symptom of a malignant social disease…Instead of decreasing and aiming to eliminate the stocks [of people] that are most detrimental to the future of the race and the world, it tends to render them to a menacing degree dominant.”

– Margaret Sanger, Pivot of Civilization, Chapter V, “Cruelty of Charity”

Considered inferior human beings whose birth rate must be curtailed by abortion, Sanger’s Planned Parenthood open its bigger abortuaries in the Blacks areas and in Latin barrios.


25 posted on 08/18/2015 9:01:03 AM PDT by Dqban22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson