Walker says he supported path to citizenship, but not amnesty

Washington Examiner ^ | July 18, 2015 | Philip Klein

[Carry_Okie]

That's right, just ignore it and keep spamming the thread. Fill it full of words, yeah that'll work.

Get a clue: The reason Trumps numbers are so high is that people aren't buying it. He had the limelight. The word got out about his "former" position. They waited and there was no joy. Walker either tells his consultants to go to hell and addresses the issue forthrightly or he sinks because people with any intelligence won't believe him.

[Cincinatus' Wife]

If you don’t like my threads, start your own.

No one is stopping you.

Go for it.

Support your guy Donald Trump.

By the way, what party affiliation does Trump claim today?

[familyop]

"Refresh my memory, does that path include sneaking across one of our borders?"

Heh. No. It includes going back, going to the immigration offices, paying the fees, doing the paperwork and waiting their turn. That's been the right way for a very long time.

As long as bosses here hire them, they keep sneaking in regardless of laws and long incarcerations for those caught. Most people with anything to say in politics are such brown-nosing chickens, though, that they don't want their bosses to be punished for providing the big motive. There lies the real political problem and the elephant in the room.

They come for the jobs. If there were no jobs, they wouldn't come. The foreign-minded talker candidates will continue pushing for more cheaper, easier H1-Bs to bring more of the third world hordes in legally and look the other way for bosses who want more slaves from commie/fascist countries.

Ted Cruz wants to increase H-1B visas from 65,000 to 325,000 annually
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3299943/posts

Scott Walker mentioned "...we're going to need to make sure we put priority [on] American working families and their wages."

He's put that hint out quite a few times, but the political talking baboons and their talker candidates only want to talk more about beating on the poor Messcans while cheering their talker candidates on.

[Carry_Okie]

If you don’t like my threads, start your own.

You don't own threads any more than you own this forum.

Support your guy Donald Trump.

Liar. I am on record since April saying that he's the Ross Perot of 2016.

[familyop]

"By the way, what party affiliation does Trump claim today?"

The Heroic Mouth Civilian Party. One needs to have a large Heinrich in order to join.

;-)

[familyop]

Support Walker. He was born on U.S. soil.

[sten]

instate tuition for illegals is ... illegal. the citizens of the US do not pay taxes to educate the children of another country who will then compete against american children for jobs, lowering wages.

he should be calling for any that are here illegally to return to their country immediately.

anything short of that is condoning illegal behavior

[Carry_Okie]

Support Walker. He was born on U.S. soil.

So was Hillary.

[Cincinatus' Wife]

Then who is your candidate?

[Carry_Okie]

Then who is your candidate?

I have told you several times now I don't have one.

[Cincinatus' Wife]

Who did you support in the 2012 presidential election?

[familyop]

"So was Hillary."

Hillary doesn't count. She's a girl, and she's too old, fat and ugly.

;-)

[Carry_Okie]

Look, this is going to be really difficult for you: Even if I had a candidate, if he or she said or did something stupid or unprincipled I would say so. I praise what they do right and criticize what they do wrong. I have praised and defended Walker and criticized him as well. Same as Cruz, Trump, or any other candidate at this point as I've had something to say about all of them.

Selecting a candidate to support does not make me a blind cheerleader. Got it?

[Cincinatus' Wife]

I get it.

You feel that you can give your opinion about everyone and everything BUT not about who you support or have supported.

Got it.

[Carry_Okie]

Who did you support in the 2012 presidential election?

At what point? Good grief, there are two points of support, the primary and the general. There's your civics lesson for the day. In 2012, there were various people in the primary I supported amid those ephemeral trends among so many candidates, so you'd have to pick a date. In the general election, if I recall correctly, I voted AIP as a protest against the GOPe because I live in California and my vote for President was therefore otherwise immaterial.

[familyop]

Here's more info. He also has a record for action prove his direction on the issue. Cincinatus' Wife knows more about that than I do.

Scott Walker stands for American workers on immigration
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3281448/posts

On H1B Visas: Scott Walker Will Fight For American Workers, Senators Cruz and Rubio Not So Much.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3292460/posts

[Carry_Okie]

You feel that you can give your opinion about everyone and everything BUT not about who you support or have supported.

What a shrieking harpie. I replied to you above. It took a minute because your question was so stupid.

[mn-bush-man]

Aren’t you a big Rick Perry supporter? You were in the past, I know.

[Cincinatus' Wife]

I believe we’ve exhausted any benefit to our exchange since you’ve refused to give any indication about who you’ve supported for president.

[Carry_Okie]

I believe we’ve exhausted any benefit to our exchange since you’ve refused to give any indication about who you’ve supported for president.

Liar.