It’s actually NOT the law.
What the libs want, and what most Americans believe, is that USSC decisions are PART of the Constitution. They’re not.
No we don't, and no, we don't.
The libs don’t.
Why should we?
It is time for the supreme dorks to start not sleeping at night.
Addresses, please.
Really, Marco?
This is an attack on the Church and Christians. Watch as they persecute pastors and believers for hate crimes.
sorry Marco this is a modern day Dred Scott..
We have no representation in the Supreme. They are apparently all powerful and accountable to no one. How can he call this a “republic?”
We follow God’s law, not the rule of so-called “men.”
Wrong. I do not have to and never will obey man made laws that run contrary to the expressed will and Word of God. As a famous monk once said, “Here I stand, I can do no other”
Yep, how this guy can be polling as high as he is, beats the living crap out of me.
Here’s what I would say. Marriage is society’s way of assuring that the two parents assume their responsibility for their child. Marriage provides a stable environment for the child to develop in. Marriage is based on human nature and is not an arbitrary invention of a religion.
Same sex couples cannot reproduce and resort to abominations such as “surrogate “ “motherhood “, sperm “donors “ and other unnatural methods to pretend they are parents. Therefore this ruling is invalid and has no binding force.
The wailing from the left would continue for years.
Very often, folks on this site will point out that we are a republic and not a democracy.
The difference being, we’re not governed by mob rule (i.e. whatever the majority votes for) but by law (i.e. what is written in the Constitution).
Today’s ruling points out a flaw in that concept: the 5 justices decided that what is written in the Constitution overrules the popular votes in the states that banned gay marriage. The flaw is that the 14th amendment, upon which the majority opinion was apparently based, is being twisted in meaning and widely applied to cover every progressive whim.
The agenda driven justices pretended to follow the intended construct in a manner that was never intended by the framers of the Constitution. But, they are still, technically, Constitutionally constrained.
Rubio is a marshmallow on two legs.
It is precisely because we live in a republic that we must not abide by this “law.”
Rubin is a worthless piece of RHINO excrement...
You might point that out to illegitimate (in MANY ways) Obama and the Demmunist Party, Marco.
We certainly don’t need another manchild in the WH even if there is an R next to his name. Marco the manchild will be walking this back just like he did with his immigration stance in 3..2..1.....;
so very sorry I voted for you marco you piece of shit.
Wrong answer, Señator Rubio.