Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

$50 billion canal in Nicaragua could allow Chinese submarines to cross from the Atlantic to…
Daily Mail (UK) ^ | 13:15 EST, 19 June 2015 | James Dunn

Posted on 06/20/2015 9:27:08 PM PDT by Olog-hai

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Olog-hai

The Panama Canal Expansion Project is due for completion next year. When done it can handle all but the very largest container ships. Nicaragua is building a canal for basically a few dozen ships that aren’t on that shipping route anyway.


21 posted on 06/21/2015 4:43:28 AM PDT by Lower Deck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Submarines are not the real issue here. The proposed canal would destroy one of the largest freshwater lakes in the region at a time when water is becoming a scarce commodity to much of the world.


22 posted on 06/21/2015 4:46:00 AM PDT by Boomer One ( ToUse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt

There’s no a Chinaman’s chance this project will be completed.


23 posted on 06/21/2015 5:04:39 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks ("If he were working for the other side, what would he be doing differently ?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

This project defines the term boondoggle...it will never get built.


24 posted on 06/21/2015 5:11:58 AM PDT by mac_truck (Aide toi et dieu t aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Cheaper to buy a little beachfront property in South America and Africa, no?


25 posted on 06/21/2015 5:38:59 AM PDT by Buttons12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

A sea level canal through Nicaragua was being discussed more than a century ago, and the decision was made to undertake the far more complicated Panama Canal project as being more feasible than creating one in Nicaragua.

Wonder what they knew then that we don’t know now?


26 posted on 06/21/2015 5:40:53 AM PDT by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

“... would be deep enough to allow submarines to pass through undetected”

IIRC, sea level in the Pacific is 26 ft. higher than the Atlantic. Locks would be required for navigation.

How would a sub go through the locks undetected?

Duh?


27 posted on 06/21/2015 5:50:15 AM PDT by Mister Da (The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Do you think any such canal will be completed before Jan. 2017? If ever even started, it might see completion by 2117.

This was just hot air from a failed totalitarian philosophy sliding toward the brink of being give the heave ho by the hoard of unhappy Chinese.


28 posted on 06/21/2015 6:40:12 AM PDT by X-spurt (CRUZ missile - armed and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

So, China will control both canals? Do bunker busters work under water?


29 posted on 06/21/2015 6:41:46 AM PDT by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mister Da

Sounds to me like nobody but the Chinese would be around to detect them. Unless of course our navy starts operating independently from our current CIC or a successor just like him.


30 posted on 06/21/2015 9:29:38 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
"A $50 billion canal to be built by a Chinese tycoon in Nicaragua would be deep enough to allow submarines to pass through undetected. "

The ONLY submarine that cannot be readily detected is the one motionless on the bottom of the sea.

The entire premise is ridiculous.

While subs may use the canal, they will be EASILY detected, tracked and tailed.

31 posted on 06/21/2015 10:40:31 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18 - Be The Leaderless Resistance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

By whom, though?


32 posted on 06/21/2015 10:44:06 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
"By whom, though?"

Anyone who wants to.

The boat has to nearly come to surface, then travel a canal only 85ft deep for 300 miles.

33 posted on 06/21/2015 10:49:51 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18 - Be The Leaderless Resistance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Certainly agree with “anyone who wants to”. And of course, those who do not want to will look the other way.


34 posted on 06/21/2015 10:59:18 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson