Skip to comments.
White House: US won't be 'responsible' for 'security situation' in Iraq
foxnews.com ^
Posted on 05/28/2015 10:22:22 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
To: RoosterRedux; All
2
posted on
05/28/2015 10:24:45 AM PDT
by
musicman
(Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
To: RoosterRedux
"Our strategy is to support the Iraqi security forces in doing what we will not do for them,"
Say what???
3
posted on
05/28/2015 10:25:24 AM PDT
by
gov_bean_ counter
(Romans 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
To: RoosterRedux
The WH doesn’t know the meaning of security.
4
posted on
05/28/2015 10:26:06 AM PDT
by
bgill
(CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
To: RoosterRedux
First, Obama perpetuates a war in Iraq and now is turning his back on the people of Iraq in order to satisfy the anti war crowd.
To: RoosterRedux
White House: Obama won’t be ‘responsible’ for ‘security situation’ in the United States
6
posted on
05/28/2015 10:28:22 AM PDT
by
molson209
(Blank)
To: RoosterRedux
>>The United States is not going to be responsible for securing the security situation inside of Iraq,”<<
Oh contraire Obozo. Just wait till these ISIS psycho muzzies take over complete countries. All their oil, gold, weapons (to include chemical/biological).
WWIII is a comin and it ain’t gonna be pretty.
To: RoosterRedux
8
posted on
05/28/2015 10:28:36 AM PDT
by
RightGeek
(FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
To: RoosterRedux
April 1975:
US won't be 'responsible' for 'security situation' in South VietnamDeja vu all over again.
9
posted on
05/28/2015 10:28:51 AM PDT
by
onedoug
To: Oliviaforever
Obama is just imitating the Democrat congress in 1974. They hung the South Vietnamese out to dry.
To: RoosterRedux
“the White House was putting clear limits on the lengths to which the U.S. will go to reverse ISIS’ gains,”
Who says the muzzies in the White House want ISIS to stop gaing??
11
posted on
05/28/2015 10:30:20 AM PDT
by
tcrlaf
(They told me it could never happen in America. And then it did....)
To: onedoug
Dayem. Great minds think alike. LOL
To: RoosterRedux
13
posted on
05/28/2015 10:31:46 AM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
To: RoosterRedux
Telegraphing the expected outcome. If the clown-in-chief thought ISIS/ISIL whatever would be defeated, he’d have his press flack up there taking credit, not disclaiming responsibility.
14
posted on
05/28/2015 10:32:23 AM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: RoosterRedux
White House: US won't be 'responsible' for 'security situation' in Iraq
Fixed it!
To: gov_bean_ counter
“”Say what??? “”
He needs lessons in speaking plain English!!! They’re so used to double speak they have forgotten or never knew the rest of us just sit and scratch our heads when they speak.
To: tcrlaf
moslems in power in congress and around the white hut has been investigated and thought to have been taking place since bush 1 but the information is ‘classified’ and all gains are not to be referred to as moslem gains ... even if they are ....
17
posted on
05/28/2015 10:34:47 AM PDT
by
no-to-illegals
(Do what is Right ... Take This Freepathon Over the Top!!!)
To: RoosterRedux
“We’re Not Responsible- Ever”(unless it enhances the slave plantation), said every democrat everywhere.
18
posted on
05/28/2015 10:34:51 AM PDT
by
TADSLOS
(A Ted Cruz Happy Warrior! GO TED!)
To: RoosterRedux
But Butt-Head Barrack is.
19
posted on
05/28/2015 10:34:56 AM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
To: RoosterRedux
Not even with the Obama administration supporting the Muslim Brotherhood and arming Islamic State in Syria???
20
posted on
05/28/2015 10:35:32 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(Funny how Hollywood's 'No Nukes' crowd has been silent during Obama's Iranian nuclear negotiations.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson