Skip to comments.
Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania Voters Back Marijuana, Quinnipiac University Swing State Poll Finds
Quinnipiac University ^
| April 06, 2015
| n/a
Posted on 04/06/2015 9:30:12 AM PDT by Ken H
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 last
To: DiogenesLamp
OK, I forgot about the Whiskey Rebellion. If pot isn't re-legalized at the federal, & re-legalized SOON, then maybe the time for a 2nd "Rebellion" has come. Call it the "Ganga Rebellion 2017" if the Feds don't back off.
"I think clean food and properly labeled drugs are one of the good things to come from that era."
Regardless or whether laws of that type are good & useful or not, aren't those topics something that Constitution reserves to the STATES? Where does the Constitution give the Feds the authority to write such laws? That same Progressive Era also had the Feds grab millions of acres of State land for parks, forests, seashores, etc...even after promising the States that they wouldn't do such a thing after they joined the Union. Washington, DC can NOT be trusted in anything they do.
To: DiogenesLamp; Liberty1st
our nation's 1st federal drug laws were written back on the early 20th Century.You think so?
He's right - the law against which the Whiskey Rebellion was an excise tax not a "drug law" in any rational sense of the term.
62
posted on
04/06/2015 3:41:55 PM PDT
by
ConservingFreedom
(A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: DiogenesLamp
I admit I'm tired of answering the same old Libertarian talking points over and over and over and over and over and over again.Yet you never tire of whining about it over and over and over and over and over and over again.
63
posted on
04/06/2015 3:43:54 PM PDT
by
ConservingFreedom
(A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: Liberty1st
Like your typical Saul Alynski Leftist, DiogenesLamp tries to change the subject, fully ignore it by refusing to answer, or throw an insult in order to embarrass the person asking the question.Bingo.
64
posted on
04/06/2015 3:45:12 PM PDT
by
ConservingFreedom
(A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: Liberty1st
And your brain will become more and more dulled as your comment proves. You missed the point of my comment and go off on my needing to learn respect the 9th and 10th Amendmens. You know nothing of my thoughts on those amendments.
65
posted on
04/09/2015 11:16:43 AM PDT
by
falcon99
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson