Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Could Obama Bypass the Supreme Court? (George Wallace Would be Proud)
NY Times ^ | March 17, 2015 | William Baude

Posted on 03/17/2015 12:09:03 PM PDT by C19fan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: C19fan

That’s a great discussion to throw out there right before a decision.

I’m sure the SCOTUS will be happy to read their role is simply that of an appendage much like a hangnail or appendix, easily done away with.


21 posted on 03/17/2015 12:37:01 PM PDT by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Yes, we are all feeling the impact of that ruling now.


22 posted on 03/17/2015 12:44:45 PM PDT by Defiant (Please excuse Mr. Clinton for his involvement with young girls. --Epstein's Mother)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Rules are for the little people.


23 posted on 03/17/2015 12:50:04 PM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Yeah..................no problem.


24 posted on 03/17/2015 12:56:21 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

“So this legal genius actually thinks that SCOTUS rulings work this way? “

Actually, under the Constituton, that was the way they were supposed to work. That’s why Marbury v. Madison was not incorrectly decided.

But modern courts have claimed the right to make rulings that affect everyone before them and not before them.


25 posted on 03/17/2015 1:54:34 PM PDT by ModelBreaker (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
"Bypass?"

So that's what they call it now!

26 posted on 03/17/2015 2:56:00 PM PDT by gogeo (If you are Tea Party, the eGOP does not want you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

No, to get away from the Commerce Clause is why SCOTUS declared it a tax.


27 posted on 03/17/2015 3:34:01 PM PDT by X-spurt (CRUZ missile - armed and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson