I think Palin is clearly the most qualified of the three but, like Trump, she seems more interested in promoting herself than running a serious campaign.
Nothing wrong with moving into a media gig, but if she's going to go that route she should be 'honest' about it ( ala Rush) and stop detracting from serious potential conservative candidates.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Governor and vice presidential candidate, Sarah Palin, has been in elective politics for decades, she should never be mentioned in the company of people like Carson, Trump, Cain and even Mitt Romney.
At least Romney has won one election in his career, which is as long as Palin’s, but with only a single victory to show for it, and he failed in that office.
53 posted on
01/30/2015 9:25:23 AM PST by
ansel12
(Civilization, Crusade against the Mohammedan Death Cult.)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
54 posted on
01/30/2015 9:26:13 AM PST by
CPT Clay
(Follow me on Twitter @Clay N TX)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Hopefully conservatives will coalesce around Ted Cruz. I believe he is by far the best choice.
57 posted on
01/30/2015 9:54:09 AM PST by
CatherineofAragon
((Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization.))
To: Behind Liberal Lines
The question that must be asked by conservatives: which “conservative” candidate if elected would have the steel spine needed to fight the onslaught of the liberal-leftist bacteria that has weakened this country for the last fifty years? Obviously, Palin, Cruz, Walker, and a few others. Too many “conservative” Pubbies gets elected and then collapse their values to “get along” with the libs.
59 posted on
01/30/2015 9:58:41 AM PST by
driftless2
(For long term happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
To: Behind Liberal Lines; Impy
RE:”From Sarah Palin to Donald Trump to Ben Carson, Republicans Just Can't Get Enough of obviously unqualified presidential contenders.”
The first two were not even real candidates, they were hoax candidates.
Both never intended on running but knew playing it out would get lots of media attention.
This was from the hoax campaign video shot in Iowa (high qulaity vid too)
68 posted on
01/30/2015 12:48:08 PM PST by
sickoflibs
(King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Big words coming from an uber-libertarian like Gillespie. Does he think Rand Paul is qualified? I don’t.
78 posted on
01/30/2015 2:25:28 PM PST by
Fledermaus
(The GOP is dead to me! McConnell and Boehner can drop dead!!)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Nick Gillispie is a LiberTopian. His idea of a credible candidate is Ron Paul.
88 posted on
01/31/2015 2:44:26 AM PST by
lormand
(Inside every liberal is a dung slinging monkey)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Ok... now that I’ve hacked up half a lung from laughing.....
I won’t even go past that first sentence. Omalord....
89 posted on
01/31/2015 8:23:02 AM PST by
CaptainPhilFan
(Since we can't live together we should just divide the country with a really long piece of tape.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson