Posted on 01/14/2015 12:51:42 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
It was posted already earlier. How many times does a false report that helps to spread a rumor, need to be posted?
“Perhaps,........ the pilots were merely calling out to their god in a time of great peril – a moment that they believed would be their last.
One thing is for sure, hearing these final words,..... is key to revealing what caused the AirAsia flight to crash.”......
Are we expected to believe that? I suggest the pilot and/or the co-pilot were muzzies hell bent of a trip to 72 virgin land.
No fan of Beck. But your description of CNS does not fit with anything I’ve ever seen.
My first rum & Pepsi this evening, all over the keyboard. Thanks.... still LMAO.
I really don’t think this means they intentionally crashed the plane. If I was about to die I hope my last words would be “Jesus, take me!”
There can be a thousand “sides” to a story, and not a single one of the thousand, or any other that is offered ... has to be the truth.
“If the last words were that blasphemy, then just based on its history of its use in savage Moslem terrorist acts, what exactly do you think it meant?”
If you were a Moslem (pilot or passenger), you might call on the name of God as you faced death. That would make you a believing victim.
That’s the benign explanation.
If you were Moslem terrorist who was blowing the plane out of the sky, you might say the same thing. That would make you a murdering scumbag.
Hopefully, analysis of both black boxes will tell the tale.
Well... obviously the correct answer should be ZERO.
The tool of politicians and the ruling elite.
Things are bad enough, we don’t need to make them worse and make ourselves look like hysterical fools in the process.
I think the staff at YAHOO likes having us look like fools.
How many times did the HANDS UP DON'T SHOOT story get posted ?
How many times does a false report that helps to spread a rumor, need to be posted?
How many times did the HANDS UP DON'T SHOOT story get posted ?
I see. So, FR should stoop to their level and get a reputation for posting hysterical, false stories? That makes a lot of sense.
No. I didn't post the story, I only refuted it.
Once it was posted, should I (and others) have just ignored it and let it stand as it was ?
Even if we took your suggestion and had the first posting of it removed, it got posted again (from another source).
Just because someone posts a story, doesn't mean it's true. Look at the stories posted about Obama. Many are total lies, and we tear them apart here on FR.
Isn't that a good thing ? How would you stop any story that is not COMPLETELY TRUE from being posted on FR ?
P.S. The problem is not that this misleading story was posted on FR.
The problem is that many FR posters assume it is true, because that is what they want to believe.
We should strive for integrity. Obvious false stories that do nothing but start rumors and thus reflect badly on FR should be deleted.
“The problem is that many FR posters assume it is true, because that is what they want to believe.”
Exactly. Why supply them the fodder that only ends up making FR look bad ?
Agreed. However, that didn't happen.
This one wasn't obviously false, unless one took the time to evaluate the original story, and the repeat (and rewording) by other media sources, particularly the ones that had to translate it into English.
This is the original story that got 'mistranslated'
Again, I can only say that IF someone posts a story that is misleading, then we should have the chance to refute it.
If you really wanted it removed, you could have just pushed the abuse button.
(and maybe you should have. That would have saved us all some time).
: )
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.