Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Voter Turnout Boomed Under Bush, Not Under Obama
Townhall.com ^ | January 2, 2015 | Michael Barone

Posted on 01/02/2015 7:03:48 AM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Kaslin

Voter turnout does not always mean it was due to “positives” about any incumbent, before or after an election. It can just as much be an increase in those desiring to definitely vote AGAINST someone. It is a level of voter excitement, that’s all, and excitement can be from positive, or from negative directions, depending on the individual.


21 posted on 01/02/2015 10:14:11 AM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

The article also should address how many less American citizens there are here now as compared to ten years ago. My area has lost citizens while the population is stabilized with masses of immigrants (legal or otherwise); we lost an electoral vote because of it.


22 posted on 01/02/2015 10:58:52 AM PST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Krusty
I don't know what Rush has been saying lately.

Right after the 2012 election, he jumped on the “white voters stayed home” theme.

4.3 million white voters actually did stay home in 2012, but they were not Republican voters.

Romney got 1.4 million more white votes than McCain.

Obama lost 5.5 million white voters in 2012.

What goes unnoticed about 2012 is that Obama set turnout records for Black, Hispanic, and Asian voters.

By the way, I'm the “expert” who crunched the numbers.

Took me about an hour using 7th grade math.

I used the Congressional certified vote totals (available on Wiki), NEP exit polls (used by AP, NYT, and all major TV networks), and the US Census Bureau.

23 posted on 01/02/2015 5:59:22 PM PST by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

Good points. The other thing these numbers point out is that white voters who voted for Obama in 2008 — they stayed home rather than flip their votes to Romney in 2012. I don’t think it would have been easy to get them to flip their vote. They view all politicians as empty suits, but in 2008 this guy came along they thought was “special” and they turned out to vote for him. Then they realized he was just like the others so they just returned to their normal pattern of not voting.

The other reliable voting groups — they are succeptible to campaigns that scare them into voting, such as with Biden’s “gonna put ya’ll back in chains” remark. So it is not surprising that voter turnout increased for those groups in 2012.

Isn’t it nice to have a sensible conversation about this so we can learn the correct lessons before 2016?


24 posted on 01/04/2015 10:38:14 AM PST by Krusty (Liberal rhymes with miserable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen
What goes unnoticed about 2012 is that Obama set turnout records for Black, Hispanic, and Asian voters.

Look at what happened in 2010 and 2014 when Obama was not on the ballot. That's what we will see in 2016.

25 posted on 07/27/2015 4:22:51 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson