The Democratic Party Killed Two Cops in New York

Frontpagemag.com ^ | December 22, 2014 | Daniel Greenfield

[Biggirl]

You got that right.

[Biggirl]

Andrew Breibart had a history of heart medical issues.

http://www.ibtimes.com/andrew-breitbart-cause-death-likely-heart-attack-had-history-cardiac-problems-419048

[2ndDivisionVet]

You just don’t get it, do you?

[Biggirl]

The facts are there. There is no conspiracy theories.

[Jane Long]

Andrew Breibart had a history of heart medical issues.

---

Not according to his own father-in-law, per your linked article.

[Biggirl]

That is why I do not accept conspiracy theories.

[Biggirl]

But I sense that now with this horrible double police killings, there will be fewer protests and less acceptance of because most Americans have respect for cops and those cops have been “attacked” in the most horrible way by those crowds.

[yefragetuwrabrumuy]

[Balding_Eagle]

It’s not the same, and while I’m not a ‘conspiracy nut’, there are strange deaths.

[Former Proud Canadian]

The people protesting, and their leaders (Obama, Holder, deBlasio, Sharpton, et. al.) actually applaud these killings. The ultimate result of the chaos a community organizer unleashes is revolution. Some eggs will be broken, some lives will be lost.

We live in different times. Remember Obama and deBlasio were elected and re-elected. They did not hide their distain for "capitalist society". Their entire careers have been spent "community organizing".

Once again, these are democratically elected officials. They vowed to unleash chaos. They have done so. They sowed the wind. Now, we all get to reap the whirlwind.

Stay safe.

[Former Proud Canadian]

Rush, just now, expanded on my post.

[Billthedrill]

We cannot function as a nation when a political party representing half the country decides that it wants to stand with criminals against police officers, with racists and race-baiters against working families and with lynch mobs against anyone who gets in their way.

No, we cannot. The difference between today and the 1960's is that the people driving the violence these days do not want the nation to function, or lip service despite, to heal. Their "conversations" are hate-filled diatribes. The ideal of a color-free society has morphed into the mindless bigotry of "white privilege". Racism has never had it so good.

[Jane Long]

That is why I do not accept conspiracy theories.

---

Okay, but YOUR linked article (about Breitbart) reads like the perfect conspiracy theory!

The headline claims he “likely” died of a heart attack, and had a history of heart disease. The article “backs that up” with a statement from a “friend” (unnamed friend) and a coroner that said he “didn’t have Breitbart’s medical records, yet” but made claims about his health history. The linked article then reports that Andrew’s own FIL said that he (Andrew) didn’t have a known history of heart disease.

>scratches head< .... ;^)

[samtheman]

Bookmark

[samtheman]

The link in post 22 lists no actual source of "history of cardiac problems" other than a friend said so and the father-in-law says not so. Stated in the article is something to the effect that further evidence is needed and being looked into. That was quite awhile ago. Why post the article prior to the "further evidence"? Why not post a more recent, updated, conclusion? Maybe because the subject got "quietly dropped"?

I'm with 2ndDivisionVet on this one. I don't believe in coincidences when critics of dem administrations end up dead.

[Biggirl]

Standing by my position all the way.

Sorry, both 2ndDivision and you are wrong.

[Biggirl]

Plus I do not accept conspiracy therories.

[samtheman]

Two people in this thread — myself and Jane Long — have commented that the article you chose to post in support of your argument actual doesn’t support your argument.

I specifically asked — and repeat now — why you chose an article that clearly said something along the lines that not all the evidence is in yet.

So again I ask you, why not post a more recent article with updated evidence? Is it because there is none? Is it because the subject has been “quietly dropped”?

I don’t know the answer myself and if you do find something that clearly and unambiguously supports the idea that there is a strong chance this is simple medical condition we are looking at and not political murder, I will acknowledge that you have documented your case.

As of now, in my opinion, you have not documented your case.

[trisham]

They’re still protesting here in Boston, although last night’s was toned down.

[Biggirl]

As of now, you are on my mental ignore list. Merry Christmas. Click.