Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Full title: Navy veteran FIRED and branded a terrorist for taking pictures of scores of Homeland Security SUVs parked at Ferguson hotel where he works
1 posted on 11/18/2014 12:08:34 PM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: maggief
Here's a close-up.. My, my.. "If it walks like a duck.."


51 posted on 11/18/2014 12:43:17 PM PST by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


64 posted on 11/18/2014 12:58:50 PM PST by Nachum (Obamacare: It's. The. Flaw.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

Is Obama about to shut down the National Guard in Ferguson?


70 posted on 11/18/2014 1:06:35 PM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

There appears to be a distinct echo in the heading of this thread.


91 posted on 11/18/2014 1:28:36 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

WTF is “Federal Protection Services”?


92 posted on 11/18/2014 1:29:48 PM PST by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief
A Navy veteran has been fired and branded a terrorist for posting Facebook pictures of scores of Homeland Security SUVs parked at a hotel near Ferguson where he works.

What happened to freedom of speech?

What happened to transparency?

If the taxpayers are paying for this, do they not have the right to know what is being done with their money?

Where are the Republicans on this issue?

104 posted on 11/18/2014 2:19:09 PM PST by olezip (Time obliterates the fictions of opinion and confirms the decisions of nature. ~ Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief
Was the firing justified? IMHO, that would depend on whether the hotel had a pre-existing, formal, disclosed policy prohibiting the photographing of guests' vehicles (and probably prohibiting the photographing of said guests as well). I would not be surprised if such a policy existed. If it did, the firing was kosher.

If not, the guy has a beef, and maybe a case. Accusing him of being a terrorist is just weird. It would be interesting to know if DHS or someone in the administration demanded the firing. Since the dismissal came a day later, after he had complied with his employer's request to take down the pictures, I suspect some calls were made. If so, inquiring minds want to know by whom, and what rationale was given.

That said, guest privacy should be respected. Richard Cohen (yes, that Richard Cohen) wrote one of his occasional sensible columns a number of years ago about his career as "Cohen of claims." Apparently he worked his way through college as a claims apparatchik for one of the insurance companies. He recounted the time a guy had a minor automobile accident; nothing serious, but the woman in the car with him was not his wife. Oops. He asked that Cohen falsify the report. Then there was the guy who had a minor fender bender in the company car, the problem being that the accident happened at the track at a time when he was supposed to be at work. Could Cohen doctor the record? Etc. Cohen eventually decided he could not play God, and he had to report honestly and let the chips fall where they may.

The point is, sticky complications can arise in any number of unpredictable, sometimes bizarre, ways. I would not be at all surprised if the hotel had a strict rule against employees making public any information about guests.

106 posted on 11/18/2014 2:21:38 PM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

The Navy vet is a terrorist for posting pics of LOTS of DHS vehicles parked in a hotel garage.

Rioting thugs threatening local individuals and businesses with theft and violence are not.

The thugs have 1st Amendment rights, the Navy vet does not.

Got it.


113 posted on 11/18/2014 2:47:04 PM PST by Jane Long ("And when thou saidst, Seek ye my face; my heart said unto thee, Thy face, LORD, will I seek")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

He endangered their $150,000 contract with HS? Why were the employees not made aware that it would be a security issue to publicize the presence of the vehicles?


115 posted on 11/18/2014 2:58:31 PM PST by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

WTH?


131 posted on 11/18/2014 4:35:07 PM PST by Pajamajan ( Pray for our nation. Thank the Lord for everything you have. Don't wait. Do it today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

What jurisdiction does DHS have in a local riot?


143 posted on 11/18/2014 7:54:39 PM PST by Mike Darancette (AGW-e is the climate "Domino Theory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson