Just what Obola and Holder want.
“an unarmed, black teenager”
Funny, in every picture I have seen of Brown he had both arms intact. Not only that, but reports are that—after using those arms to steal cigars and rough up the store clerk—he was also trying to grab the police offider’s fire arm.
Yet every newspaper report calls him “Unarmed” as though that was his first name.
They will riot if decision is to indict and if decision is not to indict.
Not sure how this is an exclusive. There have been several threads on FR on the same thing in the last week.
Anyone got that Watts picture of Koreans defending their shops... That’s the way to roll...
This is their October surprise. Groups rioting all over the country in sympathy. It will wipe ebola, ISIS, and everything else off the front page.
Pastor JD pointed out yesterday that things are moving so fast that a cop killed by a terrorist with a hatchet on a subway platform got moved to the inside pages.
I hope I am am wrong, but the timing seems so uncannily accurate.
The timing is perfect for a GOTV effort.
"...a white police officer shot and killed an unarmed, black teenager..."
There was no racism on the part of the police officer. In the incident, the racism involved came from the Gentle Giant, who was wacked up on drugs coming off a strong arm robbery just minutes earlier. Big Mike, didn't want to be pushed around by The Man (ie White Man).
The second part of this is just as bad and I've heard, read it a zillion times in this case and in the Trayvon Martin case: "unarmed teenager". In both cases, the unarmed teenagers were bigger, stronger and attacked their victims. Saint Trayvon was grounding and pounding Zimmerman's head MMA-style against a concrete slab. The Gentle Giant had already attacked the police officer in uniform and busted his eye-socket and fought over the gun. He'd already been shot in the hand in the fight inside the police car. Instead of getting the heck out of Dodge, Big Mike turned on the injured and dazed police officer, closed within 20 ft and started forward to attack the police officer again. Yeah, "unarmed teenager" is an accurated description or a sign of laziness by the CNS reporter?
Let's rewrite this:
"...an injured police officer shot and killed his teenage attacker before he could attack again..." That's what I would expect from a conservative news service, accuracy in reporting.