Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Honestly sounds like Dianne Feinstein herself ghost-wrote the decision...
1 posted on 08/12/2014 3:39:23 PM PDT by bamahead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-127 next last
To: bamahead
Say! Maybe we can get Tina Fey to play black-robed clownette Cathy Blake:

"I can see that guns are dangerous from my house in Maryland!"...

Jeebus! What a drooling idiot.

151 posted on 08/12/2014 6:06:33 PM PDT by kiryandil (making the jests that some FReepers aren't allowed to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bamahead

“U.S. District Judge Catherine C. Blake.”

How did I know it was going to be a chick just from the headline?


152 posted on 08/12/2014 6:11:14 PM PDT by PLMerite (Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bamahead

*** AR-15 and AK style rifles (as well as other magazine fed, semi-auto rifles with certain features), “fall outside Second Amendment protection as dangerous and unusual arms,”***

Really? Back in 1971 when HANDGUNS were the real target to be banned, the MSM declared military rifles to be protected due to the Miller decision, but HANDGUNS were not.

This plot was worked into many TV shows at that time such as ALL IN THE FAMILY where Archie comes out against handgun control just before he is robbed in a bar.

I bought my first AR-15 back in 1970. Wish I still had it.


157 posted on 08/12/2014 6:28:26 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (SOUL BROTHER! This house is not armed! (Signs people thought would protect them in the 1960s))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bamahead

****As for their claims that assault weapons are well-suited for self-defense, the plaintiffs proffer no evidence beyond their desire to possess assault weapons for self-defense in the home that they are in fact commonly used, or possessed, for that purpose.***

Again bunkum. Back in 1934, handguns were originally scheduled to be heavily taxed like machine guns as it was believed RIFLES were better for home defense.

The NRA put the kebosh on that.


158 posted on 08/12/2014 6:31:09 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (SOUL BROTHER! This house is not armed! (Signs people thought would protect them in the 1960s))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bamahead
Molon Labe!

Judges and Politicians welcome first.

162 posted on 08/12/2014 6:36:00 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bamahead

At the time of the founding of this nation, cannons were owned by citizens.

They were also the LARGEST ARMS OF THEIR TIME.


163 posted on 08/12/2014 6:36:37 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bamahead
...the court seriously doubts that the banned assault long guns are commonly possessed for lawful purposes, particularly self-defense in the home, which is at the core of the Second Amendment right...

All I needed to know was summed up just in that one bit of disingenuousness right there.

165 posted on 08/12/2014 6:39:56 PM PDT by Utilizer (Bacon A'kbar! - In world today are only peaceful people, and the muzlims trying to kill them-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bamahead; COUNTrecount; Nowhere Man; FightThePower!; C. Edmund Wright; jacob allen; Travis McGee; ..
At no point in history has any government ever wanted its people to be defenseless for any good reason ~ nully's son

Confiscation photo Confiscation.png

Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping!

To get onto The Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping List you must threaten to report me to the Mods if I don't add you to the list...

171 posted on 08/12/2014 7:10:13 PM PDT by null and void (If Bill Clinton was the first black president, why isn't Barack Obama the first woman president?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bamahead

The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall not be infringed.

Says nothing about dangerous or unusual.

This judge has absolutely no authority; he has violated his oath to protect and defend the Constitution. He has made himself a domestic enemy.


174 posted on 08/12/2014 7:39:01 PM PDT by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bamahead

Sounds like tyranny to me.


177 posted on 08/12/2014 8:00:22 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bamahead
Federal Judge Rules AR-15s Are “Dangerous and Unusual,”

Fascists are dangerous but unfortunately not unusual.

188 posted on 08/12/2014 9:04:02 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bamahead; blueyon; KitJ; T Minus Four; xzins; CMS; The Sailor; ab01; txradioguy; Jet Jaguar; ...

Active Duty/Retiree ping.


190 posted on 08/12/2014 9:07:33 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Resist in place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bamahead
So....an AR-15 is like a souped-up 22, right? [wrinkles eye brows incredulously]

(Channeling De Niro selling Caddies in Analyze This)

192 posted on 08/12/2014 9:08:59 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bamahead

Up yours, Your Honor! ;)


196 posted on 08/12/2014 9:30:15 PM PDT by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bamahead

“Dangerous and unusual...”?

Could it be that the judge mixed up the Eighth Amendment (”cruel and unusual”) and the Second Amendment?


203 posted on 08/12/2014 10:40:38 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bamahead
I found a gun that is clearly not "dangerous and unusual". I'm just not sure why a gun that is not dangerous would be protected by the Second Amendment:

Isn't the fact that guns are dangerous to those who threaten the security of a free state the real point, the reason their ownership and use are God-given rights?

204 posted on 08/12/2014 11:33:46 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bamahead

I’d love to know the idiot’s rationale for that.


205 posted on 08/13/2014 12:41:31 AM PDT by wastedyears (Everything Obama does wrong is Bush's fault.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bamahead

Sounds to me like impeachment and removal from the bench is in order.

Federal judges are not gods. They are subject to the Constitution.


206 posted on 08/13/2014 12:43:04 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bamahead

Tuff crap.

If you’ve already got one, keep it.

Let ‘em ban anything they want.

Keep what you have.

They have no right to take, regardless of any “law” they decree. .

The law no longer means anything. It is being made up in the executive branch and the courts. Neither one has legitimate law making power.

Do the right thing, always.


207 posted on 08/13/2014 1:24:20 AM PDT by Nik Naym (It's not my fault... I have compulsive smartass disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bamahead

Bloggers need to stop blogging, we need to stop typing, we need to get out of our chairs and say enough is enough!

We have a very legitimate reason for doing so, and if some don’t get it, even after the trials, and executions of hundreds and hundreds of traitors in our government when the truths come out. Then too bad. PC has creeped into conservative groups, we can’t even call a spade a spade, without being demonized by every media outlet, and liberal in our nation.

If today were the day the revolution started and the Founders were leading it to restore the constitution, do you think they would have us? That second amendment is there for a reason, and we have put up with it for much too long. I fear they would say we could have stopped it, that we’ll just get in the way.

Now, you must understand that Obama does not have a freaky control fetish motivating his actions. His actions are determined by someone else, likely through Jarret, to undermine and destroy our way of life....and boy is it ripe for just that. We can no longer restore the constitution through free speech because the people behind the veil control the media, and all other information industries. Therefore it stands to reason that the Second is the ultimate end of the road check and balance granted to the public by the constitution FOR THE CONSTITUTION. Which is all that matters.

I ask everyone here what makes us so good that we are unwilling to sacrifice and give everything for it? Many did before, because they knew they had no other choice. We owe it to them to not go down like this, it’s a shame we have been burdened with the age of PC bullshit, but there is an enemy in the Oval Office. Enough is enough, and we should do it for the constitution, and for all the blood spilled before us.

You have to understand that I am not advocating violence, but a show of force. A demand for private civilian investigations and a total shut down of the federal government to perform surgery and remove the corrupt, traitorous evil that has infected the highest echelons of American government. A million armed citizens marching down the mall to Capitol Hill, and the White House will give us that at least. I am sure there are even some democrats that would support us. After they see what the second amendment was truly meant for. Anyone with dirt on any scandal will come clamoring out of the woodwork to spill their dirty guts.

If they want to start a war with the American people then they get to shoot first. Then the country will really see the American government and their true colors. Otherwise they can go quietly to the noose or firing squad. It does matter, there should not be bloodshed, except for those truly guilty.

I do not believe very many understand that we do not have much time left. A lot believe the pendulum will swing back soon, but this is it. This is the fight, here now. I know it is not pleasant or what anyone wants, but this is the way it is, and soon something like this will have to be done. That is if we want an constitutional restoration.

Yes, this isn’t hypothetical, it’s dead serious time. The men who brought us this once great country would have done something like this years ago.

It’s either fight back, through show of force or possibly secession of a few major key states. The innocent people at Waco and Ruby Ridge probably never thought it could happen to them. But it will happen everywhere, if we allow it to go on like this much longer. Anyone who says it can’t or won’t should do some research about many people in government today, and see their ties to our sworn enemies, the media, and anyone that does not believe in liberty and justice for all, but just for them. They in fact, want a cleansing of anyone who would fight them, that is their end goal. Once that is done, they will seize power. Is that a America where you want any of your children, or grandchildren living in?


210 posted on 08/13/2014 3:03:44 AM PDT by FreedomStar3028 (Evil must be punished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-127 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson