Posted on 07/27/2014 1:50:18 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
Being stationed in Europe and being involved in NATO are not necessarily the same thing.
You seem to be a mongoloid by choice, not by birth.
LOL. What I posted was “No, from your posts I had picked up the impression that you were more than just in the military, I thought you were more involved in NATO military intelligence, and “Reagan’s legacy”, since most of his legacy is about Europe and NATO, and standing up to Russia.”
What is “NATO military intelligence” if not military? Again, you’re making little to no sense. And he “stood up” to the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact, not “Russia” as you put it. Russia was an SSR, just like Georgia, the Ukraine and many others, at that time, sort of a province or what we’d call a state in this country.
The USA must never let that happen.
No, from your posts I had picked up the impression that you were more than just in the military, I thought you were more involved in NATO military intelligence, and “Reagan’s legacy”, since most of his legacy is about Europe and NATO, and standing up to Russia.
Russia was our enemy, and now that the Warsaw pact is no longer, and in fact mostly NATO, that should be pretty clear.
Your support of Putin is a mistake, and one that will lead back to the threat that Reagan ended. Judging by your first post on this thread, it seems to have something to do with homosexuality.
Putin himself may be gay, he sure is light in the loafers.
What gives you the inkling that Vladimir Putin is a homosexual?
Look at his photos, are you saying that this is the first you have heard speculation on Putin’s homosexual angle?
So a homosexual decrees stern laws against homosexuality? Oh, now I see what you mean!
Sure, remember Nazis and homosexuality?
When you are practically dictator and have looted your nation of 70 billion dollars and put it in your own pockets, and are maintaining power and popularity by corrupting the Orthodox church and bringing Stalin and empire to the people, what does it mean to you to ban homosexuality, he could ban anything and it wouldn’t affect him.
Even if he turns out to be gay, do you think he must be a gay activist, or can he just be a power mad leader with 70 billion dollars and dreams of more of both?
Our de facto president is gayer than a Maypole. Funny, no mention of him.
On a thread about Putin and Russia?
What are you talking about?
He’s the president of a country, of course he kisses children! If I wanted to I could show you photographs of every US president back to the invention of photography kissing babies and children, and you know it. What a laugh!
Oh, btw, you can’t post photos here from some of those sources. How long have you been here?
We don’t know whether he is literally homosexual but he does send out the message of a man who is faking being manly.
He tries so hard and so theatrically to prove that he is manly, throw in how short he is, and the homo-erotic shirt thing and all the heroic action poses and elaborate costumes and posed photos, and it is a pretty creepy image.
He is pathetic in his horse poses, he looks like a scared child trying to be brave around them as he takes his passive and shirtless poses on or with them.
It seems like all is about sex in the West these days.
Give it another decade and you would charge a father for holding his son by the hand.
I might be stupid or something but I can’t see a thing related to sexuality on these pictures.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.