Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McDaniel Blows it in Mississippi by Ignoring Blacks
Townhall.com ^ | June 30, 2014 | Star Parker

Posted on 06/30/2014 4:38:08 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-208 next last
To: Black Agnes

Thank you. You are setting forth a very strong case for selling the message, as opposed to catering to each small, specialized group of Americans. The GOPe has been pursuing the later course for some time now. As you pointed out, they do so to relentless electoral failure. Time to sell the message of conservatism once again. If it’s done well & right, blacks will see it as in their best interests too.


141 posted on 06/30/2014 10:28:34 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

A politician campaigns. The more they campaign the better; I have never said otherwise.

Parker, by contrast, said Cochrain showed McDaniel how it was done. How Cochran did it was by buying liberal Dems’ votes on a one-time, illegal basis. He overturned the will of the Republican base in their Republican primary. He bribed his way to a victory with illegal votes. Parker says this is the roadmap & McDaniel should learn from it. She is egregiously mistaken. Candidates should sell their ideas to the entire electorate, but buying the enemies’ votes to overturn the will of the political party whose primary is at stake is not the way to do it.


142 posted on 06/30/2014 10:37:25 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

“So are you saying that Blacks (or at least enough to make a difference) are unreachable, and therefore not worth the effort?”

If only someone would make the effort!

You are correct wrt romney and mccain. No one has sold conservatism to the black community since Reagan.

And even Reagan, iirc, only got ~30% of the black vote.

LBJ was correct in his assessment of ‘freebies’ and ‘votes’ it would appear.


143 posted on 06/30/2014 10:38:20 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

The role of president DID FIT him like a glove, he was a gentle STRONG
humorous GIANT,I doubt we will EVER see another like him due to our
culture now!!!!!!!!


144 posted on 06/30/2014 10:39:06 AM PDT by Kit cat (OBummer must go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

And Cochran didn’t make the effort this time either. Unless you think the robocalls and KKKFlyers were selling conservatism?


145 posted on 06/30/2014 10:39:20 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes

No, of course he didn’t. Cochrane did the worst sort of pandering, manipulation and exploitation I’ve ever seen come out of a “Republican” campaign.


146 posted on 06/30/2014 10:41:14 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

Which is why Star Parker is wrong.

Unless Cochran manages to out pander Childers, these ‘Cochran supporters’ won’t be back.

You can never out pander a dem.

Never.


147 posted on 06/30/2014 10:42:34 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick
What you're ignoring is Cochran used the worst, most vile race baiting tactics to swing a race he WOULD NOT HAVE WON in the classic run off sense. He does not deserve to be supported as a result, he deserves to be challenged, asked to leave, or allow his opponent to win. Yes, this stuff IS that bad.

Her points are fine, but her premise, and yours, that this is some kind of brilliant outreach to blacks by Cochran is garbage. It wasn't anything of the kind, it was simply despicable. Do not expect conservatives to ever support this man.

148 posted on 06/30/2014 10:45:26 AM PDT by Lakeshark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

Um, you really need to go back and read Parker’s article. There’s a serious disconnect between what she wrote and what you seem to think she wrote.

She basically makes three points. First the Cochrane Campaign clearly telegraphed what it’s was going to do. Second the McDaniels campaign screwed up by not noticing it and coming up with a counter strategy. Third, that counter strategy was to go into Conservative Black churches and sell Conservatism on it’s merits, as Reagan would have done, without pandering. Thus pulling enough Black Conservative votes into the election to counteract the Black Liberal votes being pulled in though Cochranes manipulations to swing the election to McDaniels.

The way I see it you and Star are actually on exactly the same page here.


149 posted on 06/30/2014 10:48:20 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes

Oh, that’s a given, actually something I’ve been saying since the runoff: Cochranes new votes will go to the Dem. McDaniel supporters, who he needs to win, are going to stay home or vote for the Dem. The only thing that Cochrane, Barbour etc have done is guarantee that the Dems pick up a safe GOP seat.


150 posted on 06/30/2014 10:52:26 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

All your points are valid. I’ll be honest. I’d be very pessimistic right now...except. Dire times seem to bring out a uniquely strong, singularly powerful candidate every once in a half a century or so. A Reaganesque candidate has not been seen since the close of his second term. We are due for another great conservative candidate to emerge & turn the tide, however briefly [i.e.: 8 to 12, or even 16 yrs, depending on the strength of his Veep]. I believe, if the Lord delays His return, that ‘16 will be the year. Don’t give up hope. It’s always darkest before the dawn.


151 posted on 06/30/2014 10:53:30 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

We had her in 2008. She has been Quayled so thoroughly that I don’t believe she’d be elected even if she were to attempt it.


152 posted on 06/30/2014 10:55:58 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

I don’t think that’s what he’s saying, or what Star was saying.

Cochranes strategy was disgusting and dispicable. It was also clearly telegraphed and McDaniels chose to ignore it until after the election.

My guess is that no one really thought that Cochrane would be able to draw 35,000 additional votes. It’s not brilliance, it’s actually right out of Sun Tsu: be where your enemy isn’t.


153 posted on 06/30/2014 10:57:29 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

If I’m confused, it’s because the suggestion was that McDaniel should do as Cochran did, only that he should go to conservative, not liberal, black churches. Leave aside the fact that churches are for glorifying God and saving souls, not for politicking. The fact is, Cochran did not go to liberal black churches & appeal to liberal blacks. He BOUGHT the black votes he needed to illegally overturn the election. The idea that what he did is somehow a how-to lesson to McDaniel is screwed-upedness at its worst. If McDaniel had had the $ needed to buy a sufficient # of votes to win, & had done so, he’d be as bad as Cochran. So what would be the point?


154 posted on 06/30/2014 11:01:46 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

What happened to Palin was enough to infuriate & discourage just about anybody. But she may not be the only one. A singularly great candidate may emerge for ‘16, & may hand the MSM their butts on a platter. We shall see.


155 posted on 06/30/2014 11:03:44 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

Note to self: McDaniel would only truly have been as bad as Cochran if he’d convincingly sold the black community that Cochran was KKK. Nothing short of that would be quite as bad, reprehensible though it might be.


156 posted on 06/30/2014 11:05:48 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter
It's actually what they're saying by default, it's their premise. Her first line never says what should be anyone's point, that after being sucker punched by a political machine that has become evil, don't ask conservatives to play nice and support him.

I've liked Parker in the past, her point is fine, if not somewhat tepid, and she's ignoring the elephant in the living room.

157 posted on 06/30/2014 11:07:35 AM PDT by Lakeshark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

My guess is that no one really thought that Cochrane would
be able to draw 35,000 additional votes.

***************

There are lots of votes out there to draw from. I was looking at the general election
of both McDaniel and Cochran and the votes they received. There is a large increase in the
number of votes in the general as opposed to the primary. Thus there was a much larger pool
to hunt in if they had chosen to be inventive.

There were about 1.2 million votes cast in the general elections of McDaniel and Cochran.
McDaniel got just a little over 700,000 and Cochran got a little over 760,000. Where these
voters came from and how they could be induced today is questions worth pondering by the
campaigns. I suspect these type numbers would also be found in most all other states.


158 posted on 06/30/2014 11:10:40 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: deport

CORRECTION..... booboo

WICKER should be inserted where I used Cochran’s name. My bad......

Wicker & Cochran general elections


159 posted on 06/30/2014 11:13:52 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter
If McDaniel had had the $ needed to buy a sufficient # of votes to win, & had done so, he’d be as bad as Cochran. So what would be the point?

It's apparently wrong not to be just as crooked as the other guy?

LOL! I don't get it, either.

160 posted on 06/30/2014 11:15:00 AM PDT by MamaTexan (I am a Person as created by the Laws of Nature, not a person as created by the laws of Man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-208 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson