Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Texas Congressmen) Flores, Gohmert Introduce Bill to Find Missing IRS Emails
Congressman Bill Flores ^ | 6-25-2014 | Press Release

Posted on 06/25/2014 8:05:22 PM PDT by smoothsailing

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 06/25/2014 8:05:22 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

GOOD NEWS!


2 posted on 06/25/2014 8:09:39 PM PDT by kitkat (STORM HEAVEN WITH PRAYERS FOR OUR COUNTRY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

And what authority would any individual or group have? This bill grants no authority.


3 posted on 06/25/2014 8:14:31 PM PDT by Ray76 (True change requires true change - A Second Party ...or else it's more of the same...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

You Go Gohmert! You know the 0 administration is lying their ashes off to the American people. Put Jarrett on the stand too.


4 posted on 06/25/2014 8:17:41 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

I don’t know, Ray, here’s the language of the bill:

http://flores.house.gov/uploads/HR4958.pdf


5 posted on 06/25/2014 8:22:29 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Rewards taken from the IRS budget? Then double them!


6 posted on 06/25/2014 8:24:03 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kitkat

I’m calling my congresscritter tomorrow to demand he sign on as a co-sponsor to this bill. :)


7 posted on 06/25/2014 8:24:25 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Is this for real? It reads like an onion piece.

Problem is, the corrupt one would have to sign the bill, right?


8 posted on 06/25/2014 8:26:38 PM PDT by Bullish (You ever notice that liberalism really just amounts to anti-morality?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76
And what authority would any individual or group have? This bill grants no authority.

Why is some bill required? Isn't a subpoena from the House good enough? If they ignore subpoenas, does anyone think they would cooperate with people who have no authority, to get into their computer systems to find the e mails?

9 posted on 06/25/2014 8:27:40 PM PDT by Mark17 (Rudyard Kipling: Liberals be wary, when the SHTF, The Wrath of the Awakened Saxon will clobber you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bullish
Problem is, the corrupt one would have to sign the bill, right?

It would never get to the corrupt one, because the corrupt one in the Senate would stop it.

10 posted on 06/25/2014 8:29:23 PM PDT by Mark17 (Rudyard Kipling: Liberals be wary, when the SHTF, The Wrath of the Awakened Saxon will clobber you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bullish

It’s from Congressman Flores official website, so that makes it real, I suppose.


11 posted on 06/25/2014 8:29:34 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing; All
"... $1,000,000 and award $500,000 for information regarding the destruction of the emails that can be used for prosecution of the individuals involved."

But Obama would have to sign the bill. What am I overlooking besides this is an election year?

12 posted on 06/25/2014 8:29:34 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Good.


13 posted on 06/25/2014 8:30:12 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Resist in place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

This is a little silly; it’s posturing.


14 posted on 06/25/2014 8:31:11 PM PDT by Oceander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10

I don’t think Flores or Gohmert are doing this as an election year stunt. More likely to find out who will sign on as co-sponsors.


15 posted on 06/25/2014 8:36:32 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Oceander

It will be interesting to see who signs on.


16 posted on 06/25/2014 8:37:58 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

You can bet that Barry and the ‘RATS have already hired some computer “experts” to track down all of these emails and destroy them. The House is too slow on the draw.


17 posted on 06/25/2014 8:38:41 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Feed the wacko enrviromentalists to the starving polar bears.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

I read it, hence the question.


18 posted on 06/25/2014 8:47:28 PM PDT by Ray76 (True change requires true change - A Second Party ...or else it's more of the same...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Very true.


19 posted on 06/25/2014 8:48:36 PM PDT by Oceander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Oceander

Nothing but posturing.

It is very tiresome.


20 posted on 06/25/2014 8:49:42 PM PDT by Ray76 (True change requires true change - A Second Party ...or else it's more of the same...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson