Posted on 06/11/2014 4:03:09 AM PDT by Perdogg
Scalia agreed with Kagan as to the result, but not her reasoning. On the other hand, Thomas joined Sotomayor's opinion. Buckeye Texan described this opinion as "cats and dogs living together."
Cats and dogs indeed. Round and round they go, where they’ll stop nobody knows.
Really? The two appointees of the Clown are in sharp disagreement?? I am stuned.
Rather unusual? Man, that is the weirdest lineup to say the least.
Sotomayor and Thomas on the same side??? Hmmm.
And a rare moment when Scalia and Thomas reach a different conclusion.
Wow.
Just like healthcare where it “used to be” difficult and “expensive”. And “everyone” agreed that it could be done better and nobody should be excluded under a system that was so complex and difficult to navigate.
So - free immigration for everyone!
That is what I had hoped I expressed, but I guess not.
What a shock this crypto-lesbo latina smurf doll would vote for her “la raza”. And this is the only time she has been called “doll” in her life
As confusing as “who’s on first ...”
That’s among the most ridiculous straw-man arguments I’ve ever read on FR. Congratulations or my condolences, whichever you prefer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.