Posted on 06/10/2014 7:13:31 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
They don’t need to be “fixed” in the sense of being spayed, a veterinary approach which annihilates human dignity.
Some conservatives can’t seem to make up their minds if they’re for or against abortion/birth control/sterilization. It seems to all depend on which “civilization” we’re talking about.
////
I certainly don’t favor abortion.
I do have a problem with women on welfare having 9 kids with 6 different men. If they cannot provide for the kids they have, we don’t need to keep paying them to have more.
If a woman has children and cannot provide for them, I have no issue telling them they need to have a Norplant in their arm until they can show they can take care of the children they have. Otherwise, no more money for more children. if they show they can be responsible, they can have it removed.
The device is safe and can be removed. It would be voluntary. If they want to continue to receive welfare, do it or realize there isn’t additional money for more children.
The rhythm method is a form of birth control. I’ve got no problems with that just like I wouldn’t with Norplant.
Is it better for them to keep having children with no father in the home? Is it better to fill up prisons because no one was there to teach them right from wrong?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.