Skip to comments.
Bond vs. Holder (We WON one today)
SCOTUS ^
| 06/02/2014
| SCOTUS
Posted on 06/02/2014 8:55:06 AM PDT by pierrem15
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
To: Labyrinthos
Post #20 is the thread winner.
What had the potential to be a landmark decision ended up being a small case of statutory construction. Chief Justice Roberts, ever the minimalist, read into the Chemical Warfare Treaty Act an implied exception for traditional state crimes. This allowed him, along with a majority of the Court, to avoid having to make a Constitutional ruling. At least he didn't convert the Act into a tax on chemical weapons.
41
posted on
06/02/2014 6:43:40 PM PDT
by
Repeal 16-17
(Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
To: Labyrinthos
“They hold that it is not.”
I meant to write that Scalia, Thomas, and Alito found the Act UNconstitutional under the 10th Amendment.
To: 9YearLurker
It’s a club. The Bushes and the Clintons have a lot in common.
43
posted on
06/02/2014 8:04:29 PM PDT
by
1010RD
(First, Do No Harm)
To: Rennes Templar
44
posted on
06/02/2014 8:41:28 PM PDT
by
Nifster
To: pierrem15
s’kay.... the auto fill that I forget to keep turned off sometimes makes all sorts of interesting sentences
45
posted on
06/02/2014 8:42:53 PM PDT
by
Nifster
To: Hieronymus
"with three concurring opinions, by Scalia, Thomas, and Alito, with Roberts writing for the majority."
Roberts is still a wus.
46
posted on
06/02/2014 9:44:27 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: Labyrinthos
Traitor Roberts remains out of control.
47
posted on
06/02/2014 9:46:04 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: 9YearLurker
"Id say we have a pattern with Robertsand it is not a good one. "
Traitor Roberts appears to be retarded as a Constitutional Scholar/Interpreter.
48
posted on
06/02/2014 9:48:50 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: Paladin2
But, leaving aside that he is a traitor, is he still better than Kennedy and the leftists?
49
posted on
06/02/2014 9:52:28 PM PDT
by
Hieronymus
( (It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. --G.K. Chesterton))
To: Labyrinthos
" Roberts et al., is the person who changed the law in order to side-step the 10th Amendment issue by finding that the Act simply does not apply to the type of domestic violence (as in inter-family) at the root of the dispute."
Roberts == Screen door [Submarine type].
50
posted on
06/02/2014 9:53:41 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: Hieronymus
Other than that Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?
51
posted on
06/02/2014 9:54:39 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: teeman8r
“ENOUGH OF THESE ADD HOMONYM ATTACKS”
Your write about that!
52
posted on
06/02/2014 9:58:00 PM PDT
by
Rennes Templar
(If Obama hated America and wanted to destroy her, what would he do differently?)
To: Paladin2
So we have three good justices, two traitors who sometimes do not act like idiots, and four idiots? I hate to say it, but this makes the court better than either House of Congress, or the executive branch.
53
posted on
06/02/2014 10:10:19 PM PDT
by
Hieronymus
( (It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. --G.K. Chesterton))
To: Hieronymus
"I hate to say it, but this makes the court better than either House of Congress, or the executive branch."
Good analysis. Congress is clearly well beyond the vision of the Founders. Bammy and the bureaucracy are clearly traitors all. The intellectually lazy Congress has given up their power.
54
posted on
06/02/2014 10:20:05 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: Rennes Templar
55
posted on
06/03/2014 7:42:10 AM PDT
by
teeman8r
(Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
To: pierrem15
i wonder if holder is trying to tie the fact that we all breathe out toxic CO2 with war crimes.
56
posted on
06/03/2014 7:43:17 AM PDT
by
teeman8r
(Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
To: ElkGroveDan
What exactly did we won..?
57
posted on
06/03/2014 1:46:29 PM PDT
by
unread
(Rescind the 17th. Amendment...bring the power BACK to the states...!)
To: SoFloFreeper
“A SCOTUS ruling that cites the TENTH amendment???????
Amazing.
Of course, I expect the Clown and Eric the Red to ignore it anyway.”
The wording of the title got me down as it implys congress can simply legislate away the 10th amendment at will but choose not to.
To: Lucas McCain
No we diden’t win one. The federal employees simply pointed out that the act the Federal injustice department charged the woman with violation did not apply to her crime.
She didn’t uses chemical weapons as defined by the act.
To: BureaucratusMaximus
Neural links are unresponsive.
60
posted on
06/03/2014 7:57:27 PM PDT
by
wastedyears
(I'm a pessimist, I say plenty of negative things. Consider it a warning of sorts.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson