[mojito]

Does anyone really have any doubts left as to who or what our so-called president actually is?

[Oldeconomybuyer]

bttt

[lentulusgracchus]

Amigos .... have a look .... multiple threads on this.

[Carry_Okie]

“Federal military forces shall not be used to quell civil disturbances unless specifically authorized by the president in accordance with applicable law or permitted under emergency authority,” the directive states.

This takes me back to discussions of Title X, Sections 331-333 when Clinton was President:

331. Whenever there is an insurrections in any State against its government, the President may, upon the request of its legislature or of its governor if the legislature cannot be convened, call into Federal service such of the militia of the other States, in the number requested by that State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to suppress the insurrection.

332. Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion.

333. The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it—

1. so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or
2. opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.

In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.

There you have it, conditions so vague that any President, and especially Zero, can drive a bus through it. You can thank Abe Lincoln for this, as it's been around that long.

[Gabrial]

I think these forces will be sent into the urban city centers to quell rioting. There are just not enough police to control the feral urban youths in the inner cities. The mayors are likely to demand it when the shtf.

[gaijin]

YouTube, 4 min 15 sec, CSPAN, Cruz to Eric Holder:

“Say, based on your understanding of the law, do ya think it’d be OK to drone an American sipping coffee in a cafe WITHIN the USA..?”

Watch how Cruz has to ask Holder that question FOUR SEPARATE TIMES:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGQQOyzWen4

[skeeter]

Why is it ok for the president to openly contemplate violence against the American people when the reverse is illegal?

Rhetorical question.