Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How about bring back the draft to include women?
JewishWorldReview ^ | May 27, 2014 | By Alicia Colon

Posted on 05/27/2014 5:55:07 AM PDT by US Navy Vet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: US Navy Vet

I think all women should be required to register for the draft now, just as all men are required to.


41 posted on 05/27/2014 7:30:33 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven
In Rostker v. Goldberg (1981), the plaintiffs argued that exempting women from the draft was unconstitutionally discriminatory. The Supreme Court decided that:
Justice William Rehnquist wrote "[t]he existence of the combat restrictions clearly indicates the basis for Congress' decision to exempt women from registration. The purpose of registration was to prepare for a draft of combat troops. Since women are excluded from combat, Congress concluded that they would not be needed in the event of a draft, and therefore decided not to register them."
Allowing women into combat roles nullifies that reasoning, and re-opens the issue to a constitutionality challenge.
42 posted on 05/27/2014 7:30:48 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
After reading that a half dozen times it looks that is the author's wish (whose picture makes it look like she could lose a few pounds) and not the 5'3" woman who wants to be a Marine officer. Someone who was 5'3" with the proper weight of someone 6'3" would not be described as "petite".

We have overweight women describing themselves as "curvy". I respond "Victoria's Secret models are curvy. YOU are just fat."

43 posted on 05/27/2014 7:33:43 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Knowing these louts, they would probably include as an alternative to military service, that women could work in “pleasure services”, taking care of the ‘needs’ of bureaucrats and Obama’s “alternative army” of inner city ‘yoots’.


44 posted on 05/27/2014 7:39:47 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
"We have overweight women describing themselves as "curvy". I respond "Victoria's Secret models are curvy. YOU are just fat."/

Oh, come on, now....curves and rolls are the same thing! /S

45 posted on 05/27/2014 7:53:48 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon ((Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
The purpose of registration was to prepare for a draft of combat troops.
I remember that crap decision. If it were true, then anyone drafted should have been forced into a combat MOS ... which never happened.
Also, drafting women would have provided/allowed more men to go into combat. Essentially, the same end result.
46 posted on 05/27/2014 8:02:53 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate
The draft is a socialist tool, what we have now is the best way to fill the ranks. Anyone that supports the draft is in fact a socialist. In the event of war that the people do not support the government would be unable to fill the ranks.

America was unable to fill the ranks, it is why we are forced to take females.

What percentage of female was your branch of service when you were in?

47 posted on 05/27/2014 10:35:30 AM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

When you are having to accept 42 year old grandmothers into the military, and females, then you are having manpower problems.


48 posted on 05/27/2014 10:42:34 AM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: drunknsage
Considering the state of things, I’m glad I didn’t sign up. The air force wanted me for some position doing IT work, jumping out of planes, cross training with the army, to set up forward operating bases. I’m glad I didn’t.

We are all glad that you never served, but in your case, you not only never enlisted, you were practically a Commando in theory, in your own mind.

49 posted on 05/27/2014 10:47:10 AM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
Granted, not every able-bodied male is by nature a warrior - this requires a fierce and dedicated state of mind, not an attribute equally shared across all of humanity. Which is also a reason that a forced draft will not work. Unwilling or unmotivated soldiers are more a liability than asset for any army.

In WWII 93% of that Army was drafted, and the Marines draft in every major war.

50 posted on 05/27/2014 10:50:12 AM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
When a war worth fighting appears, there will be no shortage of talented volunteers. Look what happened right after 9/11.

The reason we have so many females, is because we have had problems filling our small 9/11 military.

You are totally wrong, our population may be on it's way to doubling, and we may be spending a fortune per soldier and his benefits, but enlistments have not been great since 9/11, and the military has been exhausted and overstretched on these small wars, ever since.

51 posted on 05/27/2014 10:54:32 AM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
Instead he sees it as a way to turn Americans against the military.

Were Americans anti-military between 1940 and 1973 when we had a continuous draft?

52 posted on 05/27/2014 11:02:18 AM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

So that great bastion of State Rights, the Confederate States of America was also a socialist country? First time having heard Jefferson Davis or Robert E. Lee referred to as Socialists. Learn something new every day on the FR.


53 posted on 05/28/2014 5:15:25 AM PDT by X Fretensis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson