Skip to comments.
California Republicans stress immigration support
Associated Press ^
| May 17, 2014 11:19 AM EDT
| Kevin Freking
Posted on 05/17/2014 9:19:02 AM PDT by Olog-hai
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
1
posted on
05/17/2014 9:19:02 AM PDT
by
Olog-hai
To: Olog-hai
If these clowns actually believe amnesty is going to save their GOP jobs, they probably shouldn’t be in there anyway.
2
posted on
05/17/2014 9:20:50 AM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Obama's smidgens are coming home to roost.)
To: Olog-hai
3
posted on
05/17/2014 9:21:37 AM PDT
by
Williams
To: Olog-hai
Re-unify down in Mexico, the Socialist paradise.
4
posted on
05/17/2014 9:23:41 AM PDT
by
wac3rd
(Somewhere in Hell, Ted Kennedy snickers....)
To: Olog-hai
The US taxpayer is tired of paying for this “act of love” insanity.
5
posted on
05/17/2014 9:30:55 AM PDT
by
headstamp 2
(What would Scooby do?)
To: Olog-hai
Get the city kids that are out of high school and running the streets to work in the agriculture jobs. Make them earn their keep instead of freebies and running their Gibsmedat jobs.
Send the illegals back to wherever they sneaked in from. It’s not all that complicated.
6
posted on
05/17/2014 9:32:05 AM PDT
by
soycd
To: Williams
Thieves and robbers coming over the fence (not through the door as honest and upright men). John 10:1.
7
posted on
05/17/2014 9:32:20 AM PDT
by
thecodont
To: Olog-hai
What part of ‘ILLEGAL” don’t these law makers understand?
8
posted on
05/17/2014 9:34:54 AM PDT
by
IC Ken
To: FlingWingFlyer
Because of uncontrolled illegal immigration elected Republicans are irrelevant in California government anyway. Who cares what they think?
To: Olog-hai
If you really area supporter of amnesty we had might as well elect a Dem as far as I am concerned. There is some reason to believe that Boehner and company know full well the negative effects of amnesty on us and everything we believe. But, they are facing massive pressure from the donor class. What they might be doing is trying to get the donors to donate and then run the clock out on them and then blame the lack of “reform” on the Dems for not enforcing the law. If that is true more power to them. But, I really think we should be very much afraid and work on the premise that they are going to stab us in the back. By election day we should know what the game plan is. As I have said before I feel like the wife who thought she had a perfect marriage and suddenly found out that she was being cheated. The marriage was over finished and done on the spot. I feel the same way with business due to amnesty and the complete failure to get any conservative reform that doesn't load thier wallet and the attiutdes of the corporate press. It is time for us to change our whole attitude. If they are going to constantly sell out then let them shell out and pay more taxes.
10
posted on
05/17/2014 9:48:28 AM PDT
by
amnestynone
(Lindsey Graham is a feckless, duplicitous, treacherous, double dealing backstabbing corksucker.)
To: Olog-hai
Any race with a pro-amnesty Republican as candidate, I’d rather see the Dem win.
Ditto any degenerate scumbag Republican candidate who is pro-fag marriage.
11
posted on
05/17/2014 9:53:40 AM PDT
by
greene66
To: greene66
That makes no sense. The Dem wins, the pro-amnesty GOP wing “wins” anyway.
12
posted on
05/17/2014 10:06:01 AM PDT
by
Olog-hai
To: Olog-hai
If the US is bound and determined to go to Hell (and it’s well on its way), the Dem might as well be in the driver’s seat, rather than a backstabbing Republican.
Not only will I never vote for any pro-amnesty or pro-fag marriage Republican, I frankly hope they all go choke to death! The bastards.
13
posted on
05/17/2014 10:29:24 AM PDT
by
greene66
To: greene66
But you’re openly advocating helping it along. Which means you’ll suffer the same fate.
14
posted on
05/17/2014 10:33:07 AM PDT
by
Olog-hai
To: Olog-hai
If both the Dem and the Republican are on the same side of the fence, then it’s an unavoidable fate, no matter what.
And both amnesty and fag-marriage spell the end of America, as far as I’m concerned. A country no longer salvageable, a country no longer ‘worth’ salvaging.
15
posted on
05/17/2014 10:39:00 AM PDT
by
greene66
To: greene66
Not unavoidable. Besides, this is just California; if the rest of the country can push back, then the California Effect gets nullified.
Voting for the Dem at this point is tantamount to voluntarily receiving the Mark of the Beast. (As is voting for the RINO.)
16
posted on
05/17/2014 10:40:31 AM PDT
by
Olog-hai
To: Olog-hai
"If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures." - Alexander Hamilton
17
posted on
05/17/2014 10:43:11 AM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: Olog-hai
Never said “I” would vote for a Dem. I’ve never voted for a Dem in my entire life. I said I’d rather the Dem win than have a backstabbing pro-amnesty, pro-fag marriage Republican win, and that I would never give my vote to such a Republican candidate under any circumstances. I’d leave my ballot blank.
18
posted on
05/17/2014 10:49:13 AM PDT
by
greene66
To: Olog-hai
There are no CONSERVATIVES in the ‘republican party’ in California. It is a waste land and a waste of time
More’s the shame for those who conservatives that actually live there
19
posted on
05/17/2014 11:22:00 AM PDT
by
Nifster
To: Nifster
Certainly no question as to why the exodus to Texas is ongoing.
20
posted on
05/17/2014 11:23:54 AM PDT
by
Olog-hai
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson