Posted on 04/22/2014 12:36:23 PM PDT by Theoria
Is the freakin almighty dollar so important that you'd place the country of your birth in jeopardy?
You traitor b@$t@rds!
I detest regulations. But in this case oil products coming from American soil need to sold within the nation, surplus sold outside. I suspect American producers are owned by foreign interests and need to be reigned in.
“How about we sell what we need HERE cheap....”
The great thing about America is that you are free to do that.
You could open the TLI Oil Company.
All you would need to do is find a spot where you think there could be oil, lease the land, spend maybe 20 to 50 million drilling a well, extract said oil from the ground, transport you oil to the refinery that you buy for a billion dollars and then transport your finished product to your market and sell it Here cheap at your TLI Gas Stations which will cost around two million dollars each.
There you go, getting all common sense on us all again. .
“I detest regulations. But in this case oil products coming from American soil need to sold within the nation, surplus sold outside. I suspect American producers are owned by foreign interests and need to be reigned in.”
How do you define “surplus?”
What about if we simply follow Free Market principles and not adopt the economic policies of Venezuela?
You don’t detest regulations. You detest free markets.
Would you be in favor of forcing a farmer in Iowa to sell corn in the US for $3 a bushel that he could sell on the world market for $5?
Do you realize that you are advocating the exact policy implemented by Hugo Chavez?
the oil industry claims it is all supply and demand - I don’t see it. The American public has been taking it on the chin from Washington, Wall Street and the oil industry.
I can’t help but think of all the countries who protect their own products and charge high duties for American goods.
I am not a one world guy. Take care of the US first, secondarily the rest of the world.
refiners here are shipping more gas to other countries.
They have as much allegiance to the U.S. as does Obama.
*******************************************************************
As a believer in free market capitalism, I think that it’s simply a matter of a business selling their product to willing buyers at market prices (all the while producing American jobs and wealth). Demand is down in the US thanks to Obama’s slow destruction of the American economy.
I suspect you’d have to look long and hard to find a Canadian (which has an economy that is outpacing the Obama-hindered American economy) who would say it would be “un-Canadian” for Canadian producers of crude to sell/export the crude to the United States.
If we say we believe in Freedom but begin to demonize folks who exercise that freedom we are slip-sliding away toward progressive beliefs.
You actually think this is a non-manipulated corruption free, free market?
Come on...
These people would support our enemies if there was enough profit in it. Oh wait....That’s already happened!
“Take care of the US first, secondarily the rest of the world.”
The cool thing about a Free Market is that it does take care of the US first.
Could you please name one country that has implemented price controls on oil and then saw oil production increase and prices fall?
Sadly, I think it generally works the other way with the farmers.
In the case of sugar, I believe that you are being forced to buy sugar produced by American farmers, and are not allowed to buy sugar produced by foreigners.
This situation has led to many candy companies moving production to Canada or Mexico. The companies are allowed to import finished candy, but are not allowed to import the sugar to make the candy.
“All you would need to do is find a spot where you think there could be oil, lease the land, spend maybe 20 to 50 million drilling a well, extract said oil from the ground, transport you oil to the refinery that you buy for a billion dollars and then transport your finished product to your market and sell it Here cheap at your TLI Gas Stations which will cost around two million dollars each.”
That is a fine argument, just as long as your oil company isn’t pumping that oil off public lands.
In that case the public should have a say on exporting it.
Nobody is talking about nationalizing the oil companies, but if we keep getting hosed on gas prices you can bet your ass they will be!
Should the public have a say in how the cattle that are grazed on public lands are sold?
And then there won't be any gas. Just like Venezuela.
/johnny
Actually with todays technology the situation is even more suspect.
Take a look at the profits by Exxon in the "slump" of late 2008 - early 2009.
Thirty five BILLION.
And the price of oil was in the mid 40s to mid 50s.
http://www.oil-price.net/en/articles/How-Exxon-paid-zero-tazes-in-2009.php
If we are the leading producing company on the planet can we not set the "international" price?
Whatever is "lost" by the producing companies in domestic pricing can be added to the "international" price.
That would provide motivation for other countries to drill and frack.
.
“...In the case of sugar, I believe that you are being forced to buy sugar produced by American farmers, and are not allowed to buy sugar produced by foreigners.
This situation has led to many candy companies moving production to Canada or Mexico. The companies are allowed to import finished candy, but are not allowed to import the sugar to make the candy.”
********************************************************************
This is a perfect example of why we should let the free market reign—unhindered by ridiculous restrictions.
“Should the public have a say in how the cattle that are grazed on public lands are sold?”
Is there a beef shortage?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.