Skip to comments.
Katherine Heigl sues drug store for $6M for using her image
Fox News ^
| April 10, 2014
Posted on 04/10/2014 2:55:24 PM PDT by SMGFan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
To: EEGator
She hasn’t looked like that in over a decade.
To: Teacher317
Not guilty, not even close.
22
posted on
04/10/2014 3:44:41 PM PDT
by
TruthWillWin
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples money.)
To: Steely Tom
23
posted on
04/10/2014 3:48:17 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
To: Salgak
If its on a public street, or on your private property, yes. . . Hmm. Interesting. So I can photograph you in public, sell your photo to anyone I want to advertise anything they want--slap it up on billboards across the country selling Obamacare, say--and I don't have to have your permission or pay you anything.
It might surprise you that the law takes a somewhat different view.
24
posted on
04/10/2014 3:54:52 PM PDT
by
Bubba Ho-Tep
("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
To: EEGator
Not guilty!
25
posted on
04/10/2014 3:59:57 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Stupid is a Progressive disease.)
To: Bubba Ho-Tep
“So youre okay if someone takes your picture without your permission, uses it in their advertising without your permission, and doesnt pay you anything?”
Yes and no. (I used to do advertising for a living).
If I take a picture down a crowded street, and the focus is on the street, and using magnifying glass you are able to find your face - tough bananas.
If I zoom in on your face and make you the focus of the picture - better have a model release or the user will pay!
As long as the persons’ presence is ‘incidental’ to the picture, anything taken on public property is fair game.
To: SMGFan
any thread with “katherine heigl” and “images of” gets my clicks.
27
posted on
04/10/2014 4:02:54 PM PDT
by
Principled
(Obama: Unblemished by success.)
To: fieldmarshaldj
She hasnt looked like that in over a decade. Thankfully, she just keeps getting better.
28
posted on
04/10/2014 4:04:26 PM PDT
by
Principled
(Obama: Unblemished by success.)
To: SMGFan
She needs the money...thought I read somewhere recently that she was not in a good financial position, but probably still better than most.
To: TigersEye
30
posted on
04/10/2014 4:19:19 PM PDT
by
EEGator
To: Bubba Ho-Tep
Photography isn’t a crime, and a public place is a public place.
Privately commissioned photos are something else entirely. . .
31
posted on
04/10/2014 7:08:12 PM PDT
by
Salgak
(http://catalogoftehburningstoopid.blogspot.com 100% all-natural snark !)
To: SMGFan
Shes earned a notorious reputation for being one of Hollywoods most difficult actresses to work with She was The Christmas Nazi in the TV series "Roswell".
She's in the right in this case.
32
posted on
04/10/2014 7:32:47 PM PDT
by
Balding_Eagle
(Want to keep your doctor? Remove your Democrat Senator.)
To: SMGFan
I’m thinking her and Kate Gosselin were separated at birth.
33
posted on
04/10/2014 8:31:47 PM PDT
by
Old Yeller
(In Latin, the word sinister means left. Which is appropriate for left-wingers.)
To: Bubba Ho-Tep
I guess I think she is a queen and is very impressed with herself. Just another Hollywood diva bimbo.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson