Posted on 03/18/2014 2:35:33 AM PDT by servo1969
Bookmark
The way I know I’ve won an argument with a liberal is when he screams “F*ck You!” And almost every one of them does that. One of the things I miss about AOL was when we “gun chat” people would wander into Rosie O’Donnell’s chat room and start discussing guns. They’d start whining, “But we don’t WANT to talk about guns in here!”
Liberals think social security is a wonderful program because their idea of a thought process is, “Imagine what would happen if social security checks stopped going out, it would be catastrophic.” They are incapable of understanding that the proper question is, “What would things be like if social security had never been enacted?” I am not going to answer the question but my point is that the two questions are entirely different and no doubt have vastly different answers. Liberals think the two questions are the same thing.
Wow! That is a really good point.
“Alexander Solzenitzen documented that even after many of the lower Party members were unjustly sent to the camps, and were starving to death, they still supported Stalin and Communism, saying that “Well, I am sure that it is all serving a greater purpose of the government somehow.”
What a creepy sentiment; his “Gulag Archipelago” is a must-read. Some of the SA executed on the Night of Long Knives in Germany shouted “Heil Hitler” as they were shot...
“What a creepy sentiment; his “Gulag Archipelago” is a must-read. Some of the SA executed on the Night of Long Knives in Germany shouted “Heil Hitler” as they were shot...”
A superb companion book to “Gulag Archipelago” is “Coming out of the Ice” by Victor Herman.
It is a great look from an individual perspective to complement the overview of “Gulag”.
http://www.amazon.com/Coming-Out-Ice-Unexpected-Life/dp/0915031027
And therein lies the root of Democrats’ liberalism, they believe that you can get something for nothing.
Conservatives know that there ain't no such thing as a free lunch!
Spot on!
Thanks; I’d like to take a look at that when I get a chance.
“In the low IQ group I’d lump the “I’m smart because I support smart people” (in group 2) and “I’m a good person because I support good people who want to help people” (again group 2 liars).”
That’s a great description of both subsets; well put...
The motive behind the first guns laws were pure racism. Look up "Jim Crow" laws and the original term that came to be called a "Saturday Night Special".
The motive behind "gay marriage" is not to give homosexuals equal rights to heterosexuals (which they already have factually) it's just a way to break down the most fundamental building block of our society.
The motive behind a graduated "progressive" income tax and and ever increasing corporate tax isn't about "spreading the wealth around" it's about increasing and consolidating government power.
Obama-care isn't about insuring the otherwise un-insurable, lowering costs, or making anything more "fair", it's about government taking over heath care, regardless of any harm it causes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.