1 posted on
03/10/2014 8:28:17 AM PDT by
Kaslin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: Kaslin
“The Hartford Courant notes that the government has records of gun owners who went through background checks in order to purchase AR-15s.”
This caught my attention. I thought the information from background checks had to be destroyed. Anyone know different?
In the last failed Federal gun control bill, the 2nd Amendment Foundation added an amendment which added a penalty for not destroying the background check data.
The current law states that the background check data must be destroyed but there is no penalty for not destroying it. Anyone else familiar with this?
50 posted on
03/10/2014 9:12:24 AM PDT by
joshua c
(Please dont feed the liberals)
To: Kaslin
this ill-conceived legislation, pushed through by gun-control activists, is going to pit many law-abiding law enforcement officers against thousands of patriotic, American freedom-loving gun owners. It will actually be "many Just Following Orders farce enlawment orifices against thousands of patriotic, American freedom-loving gun owners".
Everything done in Stalin's Russia and Hitler's Germany was completely legal.
52 posted on
03/10/2014 9:18:00 AM PDT by
kiryandil
(turning Americans into felons, one obnoxious drunk at a time (Zero Tolerance!!!))
To: Kaslin
The level of defiance makes me proud of my fellow gun owners. The politicians really screwed the pooch on this one.
To: Kaslin
Compliance with Tyranny is Treason...
62 posted on
03/10/2014 9:34:20 AM PDT by
Kickass Conservative
(Nobody owes you a living, so shut up and get back to work...)
To: Kaslin
"If you pass laws that people have no respect for and they don't follow them, then you have a real problem." One man's "No Sh##, Sherlock" moment.
79 posted on
03/10/2014 10:36:57 AM PDT by
WayneS
(Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th (and 17th))
To: Kaslin
Simple question(s)
When you fill out the ATF form for backgrounds, that’s all it’s used for. The ATF doesn’t get a copy and the FFL is only required to hold it for a certain amount of time. Many keep them longer just in case a gun trace is done and they can tell investigators who it went to.
Where does Conn come up with the numbers on how many people haven’t complied?
How do they know who has what?
86 posted on
03/10/2014 11:10:24 AM PDT by
qaz123
To: Kaslin
It sounds to me that the ball is really in the LEO's court.
They can choose not to enforce the law. Just Refuse, every one.
In the interest of public safety, though, I suppose that CT could then fire all their police?
Do they have some Sheriffs with a pair and love for the Constitution?
88 posted on
03/10/2014 11:12:58 AM PDT by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: Kaslin
And I bet all of these same individuals also refused to sign up for obamacare.
And this will spread all across the nation, a fist in the air, defiance against the government that denies liberty.
To: Kaslin
126 posted on
03/10/2014 1:29:58 PM PDT by
2ndDivisionVet
(I will raise $2M for Sarah Palin's next run, what will you do?)
To: Kaslin
139 posted on
03/10/2014 3:52:58 PM PDT by
RKBA Democrat
(Guns SAVE Lives! www.VCDL.org)
To: Kaslin
[Art.]
Trying to prosecute 50,000 to 350,000 gun owners would be insanity. Really? Not even if :
- Obama is a Communist,
- Obama wants a fight in which he can claim the moral high ground (like Lincoln) and then take the fight to whatever pitch of violence he needs,
- Obama is using the 2A fight as a stalking horse for installing a "people's republic",
- Obama wants to use the law to "purge" all the Norman Rockwell Americans, dominate them, cow them, and claim thereafter to be the Great Black Liberator who brought Whitey to his knees and "liberated" America from its European-born oppressors?
Not even if that's what is on Obama's plate?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson