Posted on 03/10/2014 8:28:17 AM PDT by Kaslin
Sorry if I misunderstood your post.
Yeah, they might try that.
But it won't withstand legal challenge...at least on appeal.
Nobody can prove these folks have those weapons.
Now, I will say this: For you guns owners in the midst of child custody and/or divorce fights...move, and move now. Take your weapons with you out of state.
If you ex or one of your deluded kids swears they saw the weapon in the house, you're had.
Could also be a neighbor or "friend" or sister-in-law etc.
Prime affiants all.
Could always boycott Connecticut, but what is there to boycott? :-)
“If you pass laws that people have no respect for and they don’t follow them, then you have a real problem.”
If, with the stroke of a pen, you pass laws that violate the Rights granted by the Creator to all mankind and turn upwards of a third of a million people into felons then you have a real problem.
Can you say “overreach”? I knew you could. This one’s gonna blow up in their faces.
___________________________________
Yeah, just like Prohibition, except that involved the entire populace. I’ll never forget listening to my kindly, mild-mannered grandfather about 35 years ago, talking about mixing up booze in a still that he made. I was shocked - but he told me that people had been drinking for thousands of years, and he wasn’t going to let a law passed by a bunch of nosy do-gooders change his life. He also informed me that lots of friends and family did the same thing.
Now what do you think that such an idiotic law did for the respect that people had for the law in general? It crushed it, that’s what. Just as the 55 MPH limit made me have contempt for the law in the early 1980s, after there was no fuel shortage at all, and the safety Nazis got in on the game of trying to regulate everyone’s behavior.
And then I started buying guns...and my transformation into someone who has utter contempt for the law and the hypocritical, corrupt SOBs (or just plain Bs) that pass said laws, was complete. Now I obey laws that I believe to have some or any basis in morality or practicality, and those that can land me in big trouble if I am caught violating them. When the government passes laws and exempts itself and its functionaries, when the functionaries are caught and not prosecuted, and when our ELECTED SO-CALLED REPRESENTATIVES themselves speak of their contempt for the very Constitution that created their office...at that point I will do as they do.
I have to tell you, it took quite a bit of doing for me to get to this point - I grew up in a law and order household, with my parents being products of the late-40s and early-50s, where the government basically did no wrong. Nice work, morons.
I am only pointing out what is within my current knowledge. I am not going to try to guess how a homeowner can determine who is at the door.
There were two parts to that battle, the land and the sea.
Leonides lead the land battle, Themisticles lead the sea.
Leonides lost only because of betrayal.
Themisticles won outright.
Absolutely correct. Ditto federal efforts at the same. These scum ride the tiger.
Excellent!!!!
“The Hartford Courant notes that the government has records of gun owners who went through background checks in order to purchase AR-15s.”
This caught my attention. I thought the information from background checks had to be destroyed. Anyone know different?
In the last failed Federal gun control bill, the 2nd Amendment Foundation added an amendment which added a penalty for not destroying the background check data.
The current law states that the background check data must be destroyed but there is no penalty for not destroying it. Anyone else familiar with this?
“They don’t have laws like that in Texas, do they?” I told her, “No, Texas is in America.”
*******************
Fair enough, but America is not part of the Untied States, and neither is Texas.
It will actually be "many Just Following Orders farce enlawment orifices against thousands of patriotic, American freedom-loving gun owners".
Everything done in Stalin's Russia and Hitler's Germany was completely legal.
Ok, so what happens the first time they come to the door and the home owner resists giving up a weapon. Do they beat the shit out of him and cart him off to jail, shoot him or back down?
The author says "generally", then you rant about his not mentioning NJ.
Do you know what the term "generally" means?
Yes, go to the CT courts and beg the black-robed clown-tyrants for permission to sue their Tacticool-clad gunthug enforcers. After licking their boots, of course...
I'm trying to picture one of the Founding Fathers doing that, and can't quite wrap my head around it.
The level of defiance makes me proud of my fellow gun owners. The politicians really screwed the pooch on this one.
Defenders of the Alamo, also.
And Waco.
Is it a coincidence both are in Texas?
In the next decade or two? That’s hilarious... we don’t have a decade or two, we might have two years before everything is up crap creek without a paddle. We have a very small window to right the ship or it’s sunk.
CT will do it that way as well.
There was one officer who made a statement about how he can’t wait to kick in a door, but thus far, at least publicly, he is heavily outnumbered.
********************************************
If the police are rash enough to kick in a door, this officer should be the first in the LEO line & do the kicking since he’s publicly volunteered .... see how “brave” he actually turns out to be (and how long he lasts).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.