[kristinn]

Being a sexual predator is no big deal when you're a liberal Democratic ex-president trying to get your enabling, predatory wife elected president.

[Dead Corpse]

There really does seem to be a concerted push to MAKE Monica a prime issue agains the Hildabeast.

Not her getting kicked off the Nixon impeachment team for corruption, being disbarred, her roll in the Whitewater scandal, not even her role in the Benghazi cover-up...

Ignore decades of corruption.
Bury those issues.

Make it about sex and her Liberal talking heads can turn it into a “Republican attack on women”/”Hillary was a brave Victim”.

[kcvl]

“whether Clinton’s sex life is relevant 14 years after he left office”

Ron must have missed lying under oath and disbarment for doing so and also disgracing the office of the President. But Ron has always been a Clinton *ss kisser from his Arkansas days, no big surprise.

[missnry]

FOCUS LIKE A LASER! The key for any Republican to gain traction is to stay focused on a single talking point when it comes to the Rat "War on Women" talking point.

Rand Paul has a great idea. Bill Clintoon is the leader of the Rat party. Bill Clintoon IS A SEXUAL PREDATOR. So anytime the conversation comes up about the "War on Women" then there should be a strict adherence to hoisting up the Rat party icon and reminding people of his sexual harassment of a young woman college intern!

[Pollster1]

Republican leaders should pay attention, because on the issue of whether Clinton’s sex life is relevant 14 years after he left office, they’re once again careening toward a wall.

I would not in general hold it against a woman if her former husband had been a sexual predator; it's easy for a naive young woman to fall for a charming rogue. When a woman has the poor judgement or the lust for power to stay with a known serial predator because of his influence, it reflects on her character. When that woman (as with Hillary) leads the war against those women who tell the truth about a sexual predator and coordinates a "nuts and sluts" campaign to demonize women whose only offense is telling the truth, I consider that to be a central issue. We should attack Hillary because she is a bully, because her actions were evil, and because her conduct was inexcusable, not merely "because of her husband's sex life". The key is to clarify the nature of her offense and not permit the liberal media to make it "just about sex".

[Paulie]

Will we ever again get to the point of talking freedom, liberty, respect of the Constitution, private property, true prosperity, equality of opportunity vs equality of outcomes, and the joys of being a sovereign nation?

Or is that a hard concept for the party bosses to grasp?

[uncitizen]

we learned from Sarah Palin that McCains campaign people told her “hands off Obama” and his background.

Rush said today that Romney people told him that the GOP strategy during that campaign was “hands off Obama”.

and now the GOP is telling everyone it’s “hands off Hillary and Bill” and their history.

OK, and we are supposed to think there is NOT a Uniparty??

[LS]

By all means let’s take advice from an Obama house journalist.

[B4Ranch]

www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/c/clintonfriends.htm‎ This a list of people associated with Bill Clinton...all of whom have died, some of them under mysterious circumstances.

[Phlap]

Hill said that the Lewinsky charges would "...slowly dissipate over time under the weight of [their] own insubstantiality."

Didn't happen did it Hill?

[matt1234]

If Hillary will tolerate adultery from her husband, what other evil acts will she tolerate?!