[exinnj]

The “profanity” with gays, the sad thing is that TV DEFINES our culture...

[Gene Eric]

>> But love is not what is behind the gay rights movement

Love doesn’t require sodomy.

[pfflier]

Gays have the money. They can buy influence and define the agenda with that.

They represent 3% or our population (US Census data) but control a disproportionate amount of political discussion. They may have two highly placed members in the hildabeast and obummer.

[PieterCasparzen]

New world order has actively been promoting immorality since the enlightenment.

Trace key figures in NWO British East India Company, and others, and how they took over education in the UK and on the Continent starting in the early 1800s.

NWO supports artists, authors, other key thinkers in society that support their agendas.

The British and European upper classes in the 1800s became progressively open about their own heinous immoralities.

Why do elite financiers want this immorality ? Because people who are enslaved to their own grossly immoral acts are easy to control and manipulate.

If one’s friend is addicted to chocolate cake, one can get just about anything from them by plying them with chocolate cake, threatening to remove the chocolate cake, etc.

These financial elites are the “power behind the throne”.

NWO has always owned and operated (therefore controlled) publishing firms. Who gets published has long been under their control. This makes people write what NWO wants to hear. NWO is very much into the idea of the “self-fulfilling prophecy” concept of basic, simple, mind control, i.e., repeat what you want to happen often enough and people start to think it’s going to happen and then people actually unwittingly start helping to make it happen.

Communism / socialism is only a front for the wealthy elites of New World Order. So communism / socialism, per se, is not the root cause of anything.

Look up Sidney and Beatrice Webb. Note Beatrice’s father’s family were New World Order merchant financiers going back generations. These two old “communists” never renounced their wealth.

They are just two key people - their are many others.

Most of the UK/US literary figures of the 1800s were grossly immoral in one way or another, were socialist/communist. It’s not by chance. The New World Order-controlled publishing business, which now means movies/internet/TV/etc. has been pushing immorality for centuries.

[Count of Monte Fisto]

Look at the men that own and control the media. They aren’t Christian.

[MikeyB806]

The reason is the feminist movement which brought hordes of women into the workplace alongside of men, turning the workplace into a femme-fest and which spawned new protections for women under federal employment law.

The new power of the federally protected emotional/compassionate sex, combined with a feminized male worker opened the door to acceptance of demands for protection of the new females: the effeminate men who adopted the label “homosexual.” After all, homosexual guys are really just women with penises. Workplaces throughout the world went through this transition beginning in the 1960s.

[Some Fat Guy in L.A.]

The media is chock full of them.

[Just mythoughts]

The culture was lost when even Rush the play actor conservative got light in his loafers. Course I did stop listening to his bravado after the last election primaries. He use too acknowledge the mental instability of perverts now he embraces it. Way back when he was married to wife number well whatever it was, Rush, began backtracking on the crumbling effects perverts have on a civil society. That was when it came out that Greg Louganis was messed up and whacked his head in the Olympics and bled in the pool.

Rush has always been more concerned with his personal bank account than what is best for the country.