Pretty much answers the question as to why Stevens specified “nonmilitary” security. Active military involvement and coordination would have blown Obama’s op.
Bookmark.
Benghazi ping.
Let Republicanprofessor know if you want on or off this ping list.
It contradicts all of their claims which is why this inconvenient fact has been simply ignored. Now that other people are paying attention to this maybe they will ask these simply questions.
1) Why was our ambassador at a CIA safe house?
2) What business did he have there that couldn't have been done at an official location like the embassy?
3) Who knew he was going to be there?