Christie messes with traffic on a bridge and his 2016 ambitions go up in smoke. Hillary lies about Benghazi and her complicity in the death of four Americans and her relationship with the muslim brotherhood and she’s still the dems frontrunner for 2016. Go figure. But I am happy to see Christie sidelined.
It’s terrible for Christie, because it undermines the whole POINT of Christie, which is that he uses sharp elbows and words for the power of good. Now that his sharp elbows have been revealed as usable for evil, what’s the point of him?
The point of Romney was that he was a spectacularly successful businessman, the point of Obama was that he was an inspirational but non-threatening black guy, the point of George Bush was the he was a regular dude despite being to-the-manor-born, Bill Clinton was the super-smart young guy, etc.
Here’s the thing - everything that people are pointing out about Christie applies 100 fold to Obama. Everything! And yet his royal Blackness is never expected to take any responsibility for anything that happens. I call him that because, make no mistake, there is no other reason that he gets away with it. Bill Clinton got a hummer in the oval office and then lied about it but there’s no way people would tolerate him doing the crap Obama gets away with. To criticize Obama is a career-ender and literally heresy if you are anywhere left of conservative.
Indict Kelly & put her on trial.
Have all the details come out in the courtroom—NO PLEA BARGAINING.
Well of course Crispy knew about it. He prolly suggested it. Or ordered it.