Posted on 01/05/2014 8:40:27 AM PST by lbryce
Actually, for starters, it's the need for two thirds of the Senate.
Two thirds of the Senate could remove him, unreviewably. Of course, where he went thereafter would depend on the DOJ and a jury, that being the wishes of the Founders, who had Charles I in mind, LOL!
You’re just playing games. I asked you whether there was some impediment which prevents you from looking up info on your own. You come up w a convention that requires me to do your work for you. If you had one scintilla of genuine interest in reading those transcripts you’d have found them & read them long ago, as I did. Nobody gave me a link. I just decided I wanted to see the info first hand. I have next to no disposable time & I am not the world’s foremost online researcher. However, I found the transcripts in question w minimal effort. If you are sincerely and honestly interested in them, you’d do the same. If you lack that desire, then no link is going to help you.
And speaking of conventions. It is the convention for conservatives to post on this site. You have come across as a liberal since the day I first encountered you. You also falsely accused me of lying a while back. I took that as a window into your MO. When a person so freely accuses an honest person of lying, usually it’s projection. I.e.: they lie, so they assume others do too.
So you come across as a liberal troll and you accuse me of being dishonest when I was being 100% honest. But when it suits you, you demand that I do research for you that you are immanently capable of doing on your own. Sorry, Natufian. You have poisoned the well. If you want to rely on ‘conventions’ you need to respect them yourself. When you start advocating conservatism, criticizing liberalism/Obama, and cease to falsely accuse me of lying, let’s talk again. I won’t hold my breath.
Fine. Next time I’m perusing the Kenyan Parliamentary record, I’ll keep a keen eye open for them.
Seems a shame that you can’t be bothered to post information that you claim is “... is simply amazing—not to mention uniquely devastating to Obama’s most diehard supporters.” here on Freerepublic. Maybe there’s an agenda at play, who knows?
Perhaps if you read my prior post a second time, the light bulb will come on.
Hmmm... I read it again. No lightbulb.
It seems very odd that you’ve found ‘amazing’ information that would be ‘uniquely devastating’ to Obama supporters but, well, y’know... you don’t have the time to post it (even though you could find it with ‘minimal effort’). I guess Freepers will just have to go on without this useful information.
I thought this was very ironic though. :-)
11 January 2014 04:02:52 CET · 81 of 540
Fantasywriter to Nero Germanicus
Do you have an official quote or other linkable source for this explanation of the delay [in releasing the (inconclusive) autopsy report]?
Or are you just making it up...AGAIN?
The only article I’ve read that deals w the delay says nothing about waiting for a toxicology report. The official explanation was that they are still interviewing survivors from the crash. What’s *your* source for an alternative explanation?
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies
Here is the difference Natufian. The Kenyan Parliament transcripts are actually online. After you asked about them, I found them a second time & read the entire transcript again. [They were even more fascinating & devastating for Obama the second time around.]
Now as I said before, I have limited time & I am not the world’s foremost Net researcher. So if I managed to find these transcripts twice, how is it that you cannot find them once?
I contend that if your desire to read them was real and sincere, you’d have found them long since and read every single word. What’s stopping you? Absolutely nothing...if you’re genuinely interested.
[Side note. (I’ve also, once recently and once some time ago, read Moonbat/Obot ‘explanations’ for what the Kenyan Parliament did. The first far leftist site I visited admitted the transcripts are real, but maintained the Kenyans are too stupid to know who was or wasn’t born in their country. The second site allowed that the transcripts are authentic, but said everyone makes a mistake. After all, if Obama said there were 57 states, Kenyans might be mistaken re: Obama’s birthplace. The ‘logic’ there is beyond stupid, but I’ll let it go at that.]
By contrast, there was no link for the drivel NeroG was putting out. I searched for it and found no trace. So I asked for the link. I knew it didn’t exist. So your brilliant comparison is apples to oranges. I don’t expect you to grasp it [not for lack of brains but for other reasons] but there it is. One, an easily findable link you cd get for yourself if you really wanted it, the other an nonexistent link that I felt needed to be exposed as such.
Whinge away. It’s what you do best.
Let’s see if I’ve got this straight.
Despite the fact that this information, as you claim, ‘leaves no doubt as to where Obama was born’, is ‘amazing’ and dispositive’, and ‘uniquely devastating’, Freepers are to be denied it because you think I should do your work for you?
All this even though you’ve already been back to see it and even though you agreed with another Freeper that it would be ‘an excellent idea’ when they asked you to post it in a separate thread so that it could be referred to and referenced?
How weird is it that you can’t post devastating info even though have the time to keep going back to the source?
Another weird thing. How can someone who admits they’re not the ‘worlds most foremost online researcher’, search for and come to the conclusion that Nero’s post had no online substance in around 4 minutes? You really think that’s credible or are you now in favor of people who claim things being asked to support them with links?
You read my last two posts w’out understanding either one of them. I’m sorry, Natufian, but this is just a fact. I know you think you understood them but you didn’t. Why should I continue to reply to you even though you either are unwilling or unable to figure out what I’m saying? My time is more valuable than that. Either do a better job of grasping my posts, or resign yourself to the fact that I’m not going to keep on explaining things to you if you cannot or will not comprehend the explanation.
PS: About that light bulb. Here’s an idea. Look up the phrase “poisoned the well”. Find out what it means. Then reread what I said about it. This is all you do w me. You dump poison into the well and then expect me to keep on playing your stupid games. Duh, Natufian. Just DUH.
No need to apologize. I appreciate that sometimes coherence can be a burden.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.