Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Facts About Benghazi (NYT claims 'authoritative narrative')
New York Times ^ | December 30, 2013 | The Editorial Board

Posted on 12/31/2013 7:58:19 AM PST by Brad from Tennessee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: LostPassword
[. . .libs claim help couldn’t have arrived in time (very arguable). But they didn’t know at the start that it would only be 6 hours. What if it had gone for 9, 12, 24 hours? At what point would Obama think “hey, maybe we should send help”?]

Even if there had been a battalion of marines in ships five miles away Obama wouldn't have attempted a rescue. He was afraid of violating Libyan sovereignty and airspace. And to get authorization from a marginally functioning Libyan government might have taken days. Obama was afraid any armed U.S. incursion into Libya could have unraveled, possibly embarrassing him and angering the Arab masses. This during the campaign season.

A decision was made to cut losses and write off the consulate and the annex before the fight was even over. For the last five years the foreign policy decisions—including Benghazi—coming out of the White House are not shaped by Obama’s foreign policy experts but by his political advisers.

21 posted on 12/31/2013 11:51:20 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
He was afraid of violating Libyan sovereignty and airspace.

IMHO, that analysis is incomplete. The same person didn't mind directly intervening to have cruise missiles launched to kill Qaddafi, without any notification to Congress or any declaration of war, and bragged about specifically targeting that family.

22 posted on 01/01/2014 12:04:10 AM PST by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr
[The same person didn't mind directly intervening to have cruise missiles launched to kill Qaddafi, without any notification to Congress or any declaration of war, and bragged about specifically targeting that family.]

That happened after the French and British had joined the fight on behalf of the rebels and Obama had much of the news media and at least some members of Congress calling for intervention.

Benghazi was a problem that required immediate unilateral action—the “3 a.m. phone call.” And that's where he failed .

23 posted on 01/01/2014 12:26:14 AM PST by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson