Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Danger Lurking in Duck Dynasty Debacle
Scott Lively Ministries ^ | December 21, 2013 | Dr. Scott Lively

Posted on 12/26/2013 1:32:23 PM PST by fwdude

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: fwdude
So often people obsess over every little difference of opinion in people who they agree with, but view everybody they disagree with as one mammoth monolith with no internal differences or shades of opinion. Maybe it's worth pointing out that reality is rarely like that.

In any case, even your article's writer talks about "moderate homosexuals." He does use the phrase, though he tries to back away from it later, so your quarrel is more with him than with me.

41 posted on 12/26/2013 3:04:04 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: sport

If I use any semblance of the term, I say “geh,” as in “eh...”


42 posted on 12/26/2013 3:04:07 PM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: x
In any case, even your article's writer talks about "moderate homosexuals." He does use the phrase, though he tries to back away from it later, so your quarrel is more with him than with me.

If you read carefully, you'd notice that he prefaced such a term with "supposedly." That makes a world of difference.

43 posted on 12/26/2013 3:05:55 PM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Exactly right

Also heard Kirstin Powers call Phil a bigot!


44 posted on 12/26/2013 3:35:44 PM PST by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

No.....the Robertson family had just wrapped up their taping for the next season before this happened


45 posted on 12/26/2013 3:38:55 PM PST by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

They have REFUSED


46 posted on 12/26/2013 3:41:30 PM PST by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

The Robertsons have already stated they will not do the show without him.


47 posted on 12/26/2013 3:57:35 PM PST by montag813 (NO AMNESTY * ENFORCE THE LAW * http://StandWithArizona.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
"Also, in reference to what someone else said about homosexuality being another sin - just like all the sins listed in the Bible ... I’ll have to point out that it’s QUITE UNIQUE in comparison to other sins. I said the following in another posting elsewhere ... AND ... this shows how God’s wrath plays into it."

I agree with you, Star Traveler. It's just my opinion, but I believe there's a reason homosexual acts cause such a visceral reaction of disgust in normal people. God spoke of homosexuality as an abomination, and called it detestable; just as we all have an inborn knowledge of His existence, we are also born with a natural response to such unnatural acts.

48 posted on 12/26/2013 4:38:45 PM PST by CatherineofAragon ((Support Christian white males----the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Glad to hear.


49 posted on 12/26/2013 7:54:01 PM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: sport

The word “gay” seems to have its origins around the 12th century in England, derived from the Old French word ‘gai’, which in turn was probably derived from a Germanic word, though that isn’t completely known. The word’s original meaning meant something to the effect of “joyful”, “carefree”, “full of mirth”, or “bright and showy”.

However, around the early parts of the 17th century, the word began to be associated with immorality. By the mid 17th century, according to an Oxford dictionary definition at the time, the meaning of the word had changed to mean “addicted to pleasures and dissipations. Often euphemistically: Of loose and immoral life”. This is an extension of one of the original meanings of “carefree”, meaning more or less uninhibited.

Fast-forward to the 19th century and the word gay referred to a woman who was a prostitute and a gay man was someone who slept with a lot of women, often prostitutes. Sort of ironical that today a gay man doesn’t sleep with women. :-) Also at this time, the phrase “gay it” meant to have sex.

With these new definitions, the original meanings of “carefree”, “joyful”, and “bright and showy” were still around; so the word was not exclusively used to refer to prostitutes or a promiscuous man. Those were just accepted definitions, along with the other meanings of the word.

Around the 1920s and 1930s, however, the word started to have a new meaning. In terms of the sexual meaning of the word, a “gay man” no longer just meant a man who had sex with a lot of women, but now started to refer to men who had sex with other men. There was also another word “gey cat” at this time which meant a homosexual boy.

By 1955, the word gay now officially acquired the new added definition of meaning homosexual males. Gay men themselves seem to have been behind the driving thrust for this new definition as they felt (and most still do), that “homosexual” is much too clinical sounding and is often thought of as offensive among gay people due to sounding like a disorder. As such, it was common amongst themselves to refer to one another as “gay” decades before this was a commonly known definition (reportedly homosexual men were calling one another gay as early as the 1920s). At this time, homosexual women were referred to as lesbians, not gay. Although women could still be called gay if they were prostitutes as that meaning had not yet 100% disappeared.

Since then, gay, meaning homosexual male, has steadily driven out all the other definitions that have floated about through time and of course also has gradually begun supplementing the word ‘lesbian’ as referring to women who are homosexual.

Not satisfied with simply changing its definition once a century, as early as the 1980s a new definition for the word gay started popping up among American youth where now something gay could either mean a homosexual or something that is “lame” or “stupid” or the like. This new definition was originally almost exclusively meant as an insulting term, derogatorily referencing homosexuals.

However, according to a report done by the BBC, most children are still using the word to mean “lame”, but now with having nothing to do with sexuality of any sort and also not generally meant as an insulting term against homosexuals. Now it is used more to the effect of just saying, for instance, “That movie was gay” as in stupid, but having nothing to do with homosexuality in their minds and not generally directed at people (thus not supposedly meant to be offensive to the gay community). Whereas the origins of this new “lame” or “stupid” definition were most definitely meant to be insulting and were primarily directed at people.

http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2010/02/how-gay-came-to-mean-homosexual/


50 posted on 12/26/2013 9:29:12 PM PST by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

Thanks. I learned something new.


51 posted on 12/27/2013 6:01:37 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson