Liberals want to stop men from checking out women

The Daily Caller ^ | 12/8/2013 | Patrick Howley

[Dysart]

It's not about puritanism, or negating objectification of womyn, or a hundred other ostensible justifications for this latest social engineering campaign.

It is all about control, period. Totalitarianism in the wild.

I will gaze at hooters if I want. And I want. Talk about soft tyranny...they have gone too far now.

[yefragetuwrabrumuy]

In retrospect, I should have said: “Never look up “selfies” on the Internet, or you will find millions of *headless* nude pictures of girls and women that they took themselves, and posted with a desperate plea to “pay attention to me”. It’s just sad.

The “headless” part is important, because while it seems to imply the desire for anonymity, in truth it is the rather bizarre “stare at my body, not my face”.

This flies in the face of women insisting that men look them in the eyes, not stare at their breasts. So there is some serious biological psychology going on here.

“Stare at my body until I select you for an interview as a potential mate, then only stare at my face, not my body.”

[PfromHoGro]

“If it’s an activity and it’s kind of fun or pleasurable, the progressives are going to take it away.”

I knew they always wanted to nuke Italy.

[GOPJ]

In the progressive future, men will not be able to look at women’s bodies because that is a terrible thing to do — and science says so.

Something soooooo familiar about this... oh yeah, the idiots in the middle east who cover women head to toe so their bodies can't be seen are on the same page with our 'progressives'... charming.

[LucyT]

.

It’s the gals who don’t get looked at and the guys who don’t look at gals who are driving this effort.

.

[Cicero]

"Helen Thomas was quite attractive when younger."

[DPMD]

Can we use this study to pass a law prohibiting gay men from wearing assless chaps?

[Graybeard58]

Nobody commented yet? Well, I will. That may be considered sexist by some but it’s very funny.

[Brown Deer]

Why do liberals dress like this in public?
Because they want to be looked at.

[Smokin' Joe]

So, lemme get this straight...

All those 'progressive' free love, sex, porn on your phone, buggery, oral sex, etc. people want to make me look away from a well displayed set of legs or breasts?

Is this the Onion?

I'll say this once.

Ladies, If you don't want it looked at, don't put it on display. I'll be a gentleman, and even remember to look at your face when we talk, but I'm not dead yet, and I'll look where I will.

[Fred Nerks]

Helen Thomas in 1920

[GeronL]

is that a joke?

lol

[Fred Nerks]

No joke:

[RinaseaofDs]

So, if you are keeping score, according to progressives:

Vacuuming a live baby out of a woman = OK
Staring at a woman’s chest = grounds for a lawsuit

[GeronL]

pretty crazy

[Fred Nerks]

Parents were illiterate Lebanese immigrants.

[RandallFlagg]

I'll see that and raise you...

[Fred Nerks]

[CIB-173RDABN]

In other words, they don’t think men have any self control.

So maybe woman should wear more clothes, perhaps even a burka so men’s passions will not be inflamed.

And then to really protect women’s virtue there should laws, let us call them Sharia, where women can never be alone with a man not a relative.

[Toespi]

That is pretty amazing. Thomas ‘s sisters granddaughter on the plane was a TEN plus a wonderful personality. She was second generation American and we talked politics and middle eastern women, seemed to be a conservative, and a devout pro-lifer.