Posted on 12/02/2013 5:03:05 AM PST by Kaslin
Look in the mirror.
If you think that a Senate GOP majority of 52 or 53 (or 67, for that matter) could lead to "Obama" being removed, you're the moron.
There are not ten GOP Senators that would vote to remove him. There may not even be 5.
US House of Representatives does the Impeachment
US Senate does Removal From Office.
Or Obama’s lies sounded more attractive to key swing state voters than Romneys lies did.
Same for their respective bases, lib base liked Obama’s lies more than conservative base liked Romney's.
Dont expect the Republicans in congress to attempt to impeach Dems for beating their own party nominee in elections, its not happening. Even Pelosi was way smarter than to try that.
That is why we must make sure that we will get the majority in Senate back. What good does it do to impeach that arrogant pos if the senate does not remove him because the rats have the majority
No you are exactly right, and I have been saying that for a long time. The 2014 election is actually more important then the 2016 election IMHO.
We have many grounds to impeach him and could do it. The problem is removing him from office
Anyone suggesting we shouldn't impeach before winning the Senate in 2014 is an absolute moron.
It is not necessary to convict in order to get the facts out. Impeachment may be the only way to get access to information and catalog all the impeachable offenses they have committed. Issa certainly isn't doing anything.
Mind you, despite my opinion, I do not share anyone’s enthusiasm for an impeachment proceeding. It would be political suicide and would squander the Republican’s political capital on a pointless project that would fall upon the rocks in the Senate come what may.
Republicans need to keep their collective eyes on the ball: Obamacare and the 2014 elections. Once those are in the bag, it might be possible to go on to other things. Maybe.
Normally elections are conducted legally. Normally the candidates don’t perjure themselves, use government to harass their opponents, nor stuff ballot boxes in key states.
Where the election of a corrupt candidate was dependent on illegal acts, then the results should be reversed. By legal means if possible.
Many agree that questionable electioneering probably occurred, but finding and presenting enough evidence to support overturning an election is a tough task.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.