Liberals Rewrite History to Blame Dallas and Conservatives for JFK Assassination

Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | November 21, 2013 | Rush Limbaugh

[BeadCounter]

I just came across these stories, don’t vouch for their validity, who would know minutes after the shooting, “maybe” Oswald told a reporter where a phone was?? Huh? I’m still reading.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/a-reporters-chance-encounter-with-jfks-assassin/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2511848/How-Lee-Harvey-Oswald-helped-reporter-telephone-chance-encounter-just-seconds-shot-JFK.html

Leave it to the Daily Mail to have some of the best stories.

[ConservativeDude]

I am with you.

Here’s what we know:

There is a ton of evidence which points to Oswald.

Here’s what we don’t know:

How did that evidence get there?

If we re-start your thinking through the facts and data, and you assume that Oswald was CIA and was a patsy....all of a sudden, you have an interpretation that makes sense of MORE of the evidence than the assumption that Oswald did it.

The Oswald was a CIA asset who was betrayed and set up makes sense of the evidence against Oswald, as well as these anomalies.

His known behavior around the time when he was supposed to be on the sixth floor (before during and after) doesn’t add up.

Unless.....he was framed. Meticulously.

Note that he also asked that guy Jarman why everyone was gathering out front. Yes that’s equivocal. He could have been creating an alibi. But he could also have been sincere.

There’s also Altgens photo. Check out this website:

www.oswald-innocent.com