In answer to the rhetorical question, “Nothing is.” We have, in effect, the Mayor of Toronto for a President.
As long as the “Goose-Stepping” RATs control the Senate they can impeach all they want but their will be no trial much less a conviction.
Even if it is impeachable, it won’t make a difference. Clinton was impeached and he stayed in office. It also didn’t seem to hurt him any. The piece of crap discusts me...
Impeachment proceedings should proceed even though we probably won’t get a conviction (yet), just to force Obama testify about ObamaCare and Bengazi.
Is a lie, not under oath, in a court of law, or before Congress, from the President himself, not one of his mouthpieces...
Does that really meet the standard for “High Crimes and Misdemeanors?”...
I’m not excusing this by any means, but Levin knows this...And most of us do as well...
I would love to toss this bastard (and his minions) to the street, but he is well insulated and protected...He is not going to leave until January 20th, 2017 at 12:00pm
The first step is in play now, with H. Res. 411, that needs to get on the fast tack yesterday...That will take the wind out of the sails of Holder, even though it will never go to a trial in the Senate, it may very well become a standing impeachment charge against him...Maybe after the election this time next year...We might be able to get it done...
But I am not holding my breath...And, you might vbery well expect a Presidential pardon to become a reality as well, ready to be foisted after the process is complete...
Then Levin may very well pop a vein in the forehead, along with a few of us as well...
No, wait... that does not quite work the way I had hoped.
Impeachable offense or not, I am among those who think that impeachment proceedings are a waste of time. There is no way we would get enough senators to vote to convict in a trial, even if the House voted to impeach.
We wouldn’t even get all the Republicans to vote for it.
Nothing is “impeachable” if one is popular with the national media and the American people, the ones Rush calls “low-information voters”.