Skip to comments.
Delaying the individual mandate is a bad idea
Washington Post ^
| October 25, 2013
| Editorial Board
Posted on 10/25/2013 4:31:50 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: Travis McGee
21
posted on
10/25/2013 5:21:46 PM PDT
by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
To: Travis McGee
22
posted on
10/25/2013 5:23:30 PM PDT
by
TADSLOS
(The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
“buyers will probably have plenty of time to obtain coverage before running afoul of the penalty”
PROBABLY?????
Great. Let’s base policy, taxes and penalties on unwarranted optimism. After all, practically every technically knowledgeable person who’s been invited on any media outlet to comment on the fixability of oBamKare.gov have declared the whole thing a disaster of near biblical proportions and very likely simply unfixable, as least for several months and maybe years.
After all, CNN and others have been citing an article that says 96% of all government IT projects with bid prices over $10,000,000 fail, while ESP solutions says it’s 70%: http://www.espsolutionsgroup.com/espweb/assets/files/ESP_QPM_ORG_revised.pdf
Only die-hard Obammunist supporters (like WaPo) are pretending like all is well in oBamaKare land, so let’s just keep plunging the rest of the train over the cliff too. And for anyone who believes that, I’ve got a sweet solid gold bridge in Brooklyn for sale cheap. It’s lit at night with rainbows, and Skittles-pooping Unicorns direct the traffic. Hey, pretty much like oBamaKare itself now that I think about it.
23
posted on
10/25/2013 5:28:30 PM PDT
by
catnipman
(Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
To: Travis McGee
Good Lord, how do you dream this stuff up?
I “Like” it.
24
posted on
10/25/2013 6:06:17 PM PDT
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
If Congress wants to help, it could make sure the necessary funds are appropriated to complete the Affordable Care Acts implementation.Oh, how I would love to see the looks on the face of Boehner and the rest of the House Republicans if Obama and Reid come to them requesting more money for ACA implementation. I don't know, if I was in their shoes, that I would be able to resist breaking out in uncontrollable, hilarious laughter. Followed, of course, by a loud, emphatic GET STUFFED!.
25
posted on
10/25/2013 6:13:24 PM PDT
by
Spartan79
(I view great cities as pestilential to the morals, the health, and the liberties of man.)
To: Spartan79
Then, by all means, let’s not delay it. Implement fully 100% now. Good and hard.
Let’s also continue to have Medicaid enrollments piling up at an alarmingly high rate while also having the young and healthy enroll in Exchange plans at an alarmingly low rate. Please, more.
26
posted on
10/25/2013 7:10:25 PM PDT
by
FAA
To: Travis McGee
27
posted on
10/25/2013 7:45:26 PM PDT
by
willk
To: MulberryDraw
It’s not $95. It’s 1% of your income, whichever is higher. Then it triples every year. They will squeeze you until you join.
1% of my income is not something I am willing to pay!
28
posted on
10/25/2013 7:50:25 PM PDT
by
BunnySlippers
(I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
To: Brad from Tennessee
The Post is pointing out the fragility of the ACA house of cards. Any delay of the mandate will reduce enrollments of young healthy people while the chronically ill continue to sign up. The insurers business formula is based on the timetable in the law and on the penalties. Once Congress starts tinkering it will be at the expense of the insurers who would then be justified in raising rates or pulling out of the program. The White House most likely has a single payer amendment, already written, to replace the private insurance component of the law. Maybe its hidden in the 20,000 pages of regulations.
Everyone's already seen the
CBS News story from this morning on there already being an unsustainable number Medicaid enrollees in states where the exchanges are working, right?
To: tanknetter
Thanks for link. I saw another story tonight saying all of Oregon's enrollments—which were held up this week as an ObamaCare success story—turn out to be Medicaid clients. The Medicaid expansion is being funded by looting $760 billion from Medicare.
30
posted on
10/25/2013 8:21:59 PM PDT
by
Brad from Tennessee
(A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
... insurance buyers will probably have plenty of time to obtain coverage before running afoul of the penalty. I wonder how they deduced the word "probably" in the above...sounds more like whistling past the graveyard.
31
posted on
10/26/2013 3:48:37 AM PDT
by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson