Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama to the American people: Raising the debt ceiling doesn't increase debt
American Thinker ^ | 09/19/2013 | Rick Moran

Posted on 09/19/2013 8:13:59 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: DH

The pixies and fairies are called the Federal Reserve. That’s where the magical Money Tree is.


41 posted on 09/19/2013 10:26:23 AM PDT by SargeK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I assume Mr. Obama, you will be cutting me a personal check for that $2500 Obamacare was to save me


42 posted on 09/19/2013 10:30:37 AM PDT by Farnsworth ("The people have always some champion whom they set over them and nurse into greatness...This and no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

“Then the government defaults.”

Not at all. There is more than enough in the current revenue stream to pay all of the debt obligations. However, the vote buying would certainly be at risk!


43 posted on 09/19/2013 10:53:35 AM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The government prints worthless paper as money and it is called Quantitative Easing. If I did the same, it is called counterfeiting. Same actions, different outcomes. Magic!


44 posted on 09/19/2013 11:07:43 AM PDT by TexasRepublic (Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CSM
Not at all. There is more than enough in the current revenue stream to pay all of the debt obligations. However, the vote buying would certainly be at risk!

What about the hundreds of billions in other obligations? The million and one things the government buys every month to keep everything going? The salaries? Pensions? Social Security? Medicare payments? Won't the government default on at least part of those?

45 posted on 09/19/2013 11:08:04 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

He was continuing to treat us like 3 years old. What’s new?


46 posted on 09/19/2013 11:10:07 AM PDT by Libertynotfree (Over spending, Over taxes, and Over regulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

” All it does is it says you got to pay the bills that you’ve already racked up.”


What part of “already racked up” don’t you understand?


47 posted on 09/19/2013 11:38:01 AM PDT by DH (Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg; CSM

CSM: “Not at all. There is more than enough in the current revenue stream to pay all of the debt obligations. However, the vote buying would certainly be at risk!”

What about the hundreds of billions in other obligations? The million and one things the government buys every month to keep everything going? The salaries? Pensions? Social Security? Medicare payments? Won’t the government default on at least part of those?


I believe the term “default” in this context only applies to the failure to honor *debt* obligations. The only way the US would be in default is if the US Treasury does not pay back the principle on maturing treasury bonds and/or the interest due on existing bonds.

In the last debate about raising the debt ceiling, the Dems and liberals argued that the US Treasury had no authority to prioritize payment of obligations, and therefore any failure to raise the ceiling would automatically put debt (US bonds) obligations into default. This is probably not true. And even if that is true, the current president has not shown much restraint in issuing questionable executive orders. If he really wanted to, he could sign an EO instructing his Treasury Secretary to make honoring US bonds the top priority, and this would make “sure that the full faith and credit of the United States is preserved.”

The Republicans back then tried to pass a law that would make honoring US debt the top priority to prevent a technical default, but of course, the Senate Dems defeated that.


48 posted on 09/19/2013 11:55:33 AM PDT by Synthesist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Synthesist
I believe the term “default” in this context only applies to the failure to honor *debt* obligations. The only way the US would be in default is if the US Treasury does not pay back the principle on maturing treasury bonds and/or the interest due on existing bonds.

That appears to be the case and it is a very narrow definition of default. If I pay some of my obligations but not others then whether or not I'm in default depends on ones point of view. To those I paid then I'm not in default. To those I stiffed then I am. Let there be no mistake. If there is no increase in the debt limit then the government defaults to somebody. But if that is the only way to force some restraint in spending then the long term gain should outweigh the short term pain. But I'm not holding by breath on anything good coming out of it. The likely scenarion is that the two sides will bluster to the end. The government will get shut down until a clear political loser appears, then that side will cave to the other.

49 posted on 09/19/2013 12:02:55 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If the debt won’t increase even with a ceiling hike, then there’s no need for a debt ceiling hike.


50 posted on 09/19/2013 12:12:00 PM PDT by kevao (Biblical Jesus: Give your money to the poor. Socialist Jesus: Give your neighbor's money to the poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So, then, it doesn’t matter if the debt limit is raised. So lets not do it, right?


51 posted on 09/19/2013 12:12:58 PM PDT by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Generally what you are listing is the vote buying activity that I referenced. Given the current revenue stream, if the President prioritized the budget he could cover the debt payments, SS payments, Medicare payments and critical operations would remain intact.

The rest is fluff that needs to be halted anyway, so it wouldn’t hurt anyone to shut it down. However, as we saw during the sequestor, they would actually direct the budget away from the critical items so that they could CLAIM that we are defaulting and that you are an evil bastige!


52 posted on 09/19/2013 1:22:25 PM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Obama went on to suggest that “the average person” mistakenly thinks that raising the debt ceiling means the U.S. is racking up more debt:”


This goon, is SHAMELESS.


53 posted on 09/22/2013 12:23:42 AM PDT by ourworldawry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson