Could a rebel dropped Chemical Weapon lead to war

vanity | 31 August 2013` | Trueblackman

[Trueblackman]

The following article seems to support my assessment of this theory.....http://www.examiner.com/article/breaking-news-rebels-admit-gas-attack-result-of-mishandling-chemical-weapons

[no-to-illegals]

No doubt. Ruses are common out of D.C. in this day. It was the videos fault after all.

[no-to-illegals]

one point point True and then will be gone ... to tell the truth nobody is certain of the death toll. Could be lower than what Americans are being led to believe by those in power and giving out the numbers. Is difficult to trust any of them is my problem and perspective.

[Repeal The 17th]

http://www.examiner.com/article/breaking-news-rebels-admit-gas-attack-result-of-mishandling-chemical-weapons

[mylife]

He is itching bad, but I think he has shown his hand and the world has said no.
He won’t do a thing.
He balked.

He has to be most uncomfortable at the moment.

[Yosemitest]

There are several sources that have identified the source of the chemical attack came from Saudi Prince Bandar
and "the militant group Jabhat al-Nusra, which is linked to al-Qaida, announced

that it would similarly attack civilians in the Assad regime’s heartland of Latakia on Syria’s western coast".

Remember, that's just one of many sources.

STATE DEPT. SPOKESWOMAN ADMIT U.S. DOESN'T KNOW IF ASSAD ORDERED CHEMICAL ATTACK




Toxic Catch: SYRIA REBELS' CHEMICAL LAB Uncovered Near Damascus, ( 4:51 )

Published on Jul 14, 2013

Syrian state TV says the military has found a chemical laboratory
which produces poisonous materials in the town of Jobar on the outskirts of Damascus.
Sources claim the REBELS were planning to stuff shells with the chemicals and use them to attack the capital.
RT's Middle East correspondent Paula Slier reports.

The Muslims are guilty of the chemical attack, not the Christians, and the ILLEGAL ALIEN IN CHIEF knows it.
But the ARAB-KENYANand MUSLIM defiling the Oval Office doesn't care.
Barack Hussein Obama II, (a.k.a. Barry Soetoro) just want to turn Syria into another Muslim Brotherhood run country, and kill Christians.
It's just that simple!

If you want to AIR STRIKE someone, strike the GUILTY ONES, Saudia Arabia, and Saudi Prince Bandar, along with ALL the Muslim Brotherhood.
And strike the ILLEGAL ALIEN IN CHIEF, while you're at it.

[no-to-illegals]

Am always happy to see someone, especially you, on the top of the mountain when it comes to coming in with the moistest of the most in information available. Thank You!

[Chode]

pls take what's said at the examiner with a helthy dose of salt... from:http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Examiner.com

Examiner.com is a multiuser blogging site that presents itself as a news site. Don't be fooled.

Examiner.com pays its writers based (among other things) on pageviews.^[1] As a result, a lot of Examiner material tends to be sensationalistic to attract attention — positive or negative doesn't matter, it's all clicks. Headlines such as "U.S. to bomb moon on UFO witness John Lennon's birthday"^[2] and "Official disclosure of extraterrestrial life is imminent"^[3] are par for the course.

You will see enthusiastic Examiner bloggers linkspamming furiously on other sites, often touting their work as "media coverage" (and themselves as "journalists" or "the press"^[4]) rather than just a blog post they themselves wrote. Not that it pays very well — Writers Weekly considers it "just another pay-per-click meat market,"^[5][6] exploiting writers to attract people to their site by paying them pennies.

Cranks and those with really bad critical thinking skills will link Examiner articles as if they're edited journalism rather than just some guy blogging. If you use an Examiner page as a reference for anything whatsoever, treat it with great caution. Not all Examiners are rubbish, but it's the way to bet.

The domain name used to be owned by the San Francisco Examiner, a proper (if free and local) newspaper, which now uses sfexaminer.com. It's not clear what they were thinking when giving it up.

[Cyber Liberty]

I see the mods moved this to “news.” Great!

Thank you for you service and for your observations. I think you are correct. Nobody is ever going to know for sure how this trigger got pulled. But I do want to know from where these weapons came.

[no-to-illegals]

Is Mint news part of the examiner?

[no-to-illegals]

my apology True ... may be here for a while longer. Thanks for helping ... and believe me ... your post helps.

[no-to-illegals]

The truth maybe is Iraq.

[The Bat Ladys Husband]

As a former NBC (nuclear, biological, chemical) trained officer I was taught that blister agents (primarily mustard agent) and Sarin and VX (nerve agents) are “persistent” agents and areas contaminated by these agents must be decontaminated before unprotected access is allowed. In spite of this, the videos show unprotected personnel treating casualties. I would have to agree that this looks like a localized accident with the treatment being carried out outside the affected area.

[tennmountainman]

Was this gas military grade or home cooked? Was this gas stolen by the
Jihadist rebels and set off intentionally or by a accidental home cooking operation?
Did any missiles Syria lobbed hit a rebel home cooking operation or a stash
of stolen rebel chemicals?
The truth is, we don’t know!

[Cyber Liberty]

That’s what I suspect as well.

[no-to-illegals]

Also to be clear, am forced to agree with tennmountainman.

[Yosemitest]

Go get'em and nail'em to the wall.
Then if the Kenyan Turd wants "a little skin in the game", peel some off of HIM and let HIM feel the pain!

[Chode]

LOL, wouldn't surprise me...

[Trueblackman]

Thank for your input, now I was trained in NBC as I worked on the flight deck of carriers, but this seems to me that something was mishandled that caused a cook off of a chemical stock pile.

[no-to-illegals]

Truth is Chode I do not know. Would like to know if anyone has any information on prior Breaking News article from Mint News and was it legit. Am thinking it maybe was. Not certain but this is information that should be determined as fact or not fact.