Replies

Am I just being paranoid? Someone once told me that just because you are paranoid doesn't mean that no one is out to get you.

I also received a letter from the IRS saying they have recalculated my taxes for 2010 and I now owe them money.

Democrats will fire on the lowly if it suits them

WhooHoo! Found myself on one of the lists
Vikingkitties blogspot, with this one...

If you can kill your own baby,
what other bridges are there?

Rated scariest post they ever read!

Let’s make our OWN list!!!!

He got's a little list?

I was recently blessed to obtain access to a brand new two volume set of "Debate on the Constitution" -- the writings of our founders, as they debated what would, finally, become our Constitution.

The earliest mention of the right to bear arms (on p. 155 of 1236 in the first volume) is this:

"Another source of power in a government is a military force. But, this, to be efficient, must be superior to any force that exists among the people, or which they can command; for otherwise, this force would be annihilated, on the first acts of of oppressive aggression. Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretence, raised in the United States. A military force, at the command of Congress, can execute no laws, but such as the people perceive to be just and constitutional; for they will possess the power, and jealousy will raise the inclination, to resist the execution of a law which appears to them to be unjust and oppressive. <SNIP> The source of power is in the people of this country, and cannot for ages, and probably never, will be removed."

"Marcus", the author of the above quotation -- dated October 15, 1787 -- knew what he was talking about.

~~~~~~~~~

I read the comments of the feckless liberal t*rds at DUmb@$$ Underwear" and, although a very few might have the guts to join with a leftist dictator's JBST's, the facts are this:

The vast majority of troops in today's "standing army" (U.S. Armed Forces) are there precisely -- because they are -- patriots -- who will defect and join with their countrymen if ordered by a dictatorial pResident to fire upon their fellow Americans. (Just ask any GI or Veteran you know well enough to do so...)
The DUmb@$$3$ cite a theoretical body-armored force of thirty (30) JBSTs assaulting a single patriot's home.
In this day of body armor, those in the know have long since changed their "defense drill" from "two to center of mass and one to the head" to "head shots -- until they drop".
Any reasonably competent rifleman should be able to execute two head shots on a field of thirty targets before he is disabled.
At that rate, fifteen such unConstitutional assaults would result in total elimination of that entire 30-member JBST force. (With a maximum of just fifteen (15) Patriots eliminated...)
And that attrition rate does not take into consideration that, when the news spreads of such government perfidy, tacit "Open Hunting Season" would be declared on anyone daring to don the government JBST uniform -- wherever they are (in -- or out of -- uniform).
Assume that a dictator could raise a "standing army" of 100 thousand JBSTs.
How long would they expect to survive against a populace of 100 MILLION armed Patriots? (That's a 1,000:1 odds ratio for the mathematically deficient...)
Without doubt, the would-be JBSTs are already aware of those odds (or would be forcibly so enlightened after their first few unConstitutional assaults).
Even the most rabidly power-hungry of the would-be JBSTs want to go home to their families... How many would be willing to "fight to the last man" to honor any dictator's madness? How many such "gun-grabbing" assaults would actually be manned? Not many...

Even if a dictator were insane enough to "light the fuze" by ordering his JBSTs to assault Americans in their homes to kill them and seize their weapons, few of the JBSTs would actually be willing to follow his orders. And da*ned few would be stupid enough to repeat that NO-WIN scenario more than a very few times.

And there would still be at least 99,550,000 armed patriots remaining to ensure that the dictator -- and his few remaining supporters -- would not remain in power in sufficient numbers to ever purse such idiocy again.

Those odds are well known by those who would try to disarm Americans.

~~~~~~~~~~~

I seriously doubt that -- even supported by UN troops (whose blue helmets make excellent aiming points) -- the NO POSSIBLE WIN attempt to forcibly disarm America's People will ever be made.

Just ask "Marcus" and his fellow Patriots:

"Amendment II. A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

Hmmm. I use ixquickdotcom and found someone has set up a myspace page with My handle, and a linky back to My profile page but not much else. Google was totally useless. I guess living in the non-citified portions of this great land and having no permanent location, let alone being a NonResident citizen has its benifits. *grin* Great news!

I also received a letter from the IRS saying they have recalculated my taxes for 2010 and I now owe them money.

Just got that letter this week too --- for 2011 taxes.

"they" are saying we are people who will fire on the government in certain instances

"They" are right.....