Posted on 07/25/2013 8:01:52 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
New Orleans has going for it a very low cost of living, Memphis, nearly so.
That's good abb...
Thanks guys...not that you mention it, and with the actual line, it does come back...
The democrats ran out of the PUBLIC’S CRACK.
Because I'm very familiar with it, they used this same rationale in Pittsburgh. The libs in the city were upset because all their tax base had moved to the suburbs. No one wanted to come downtown to shop or spend money--and why would they, with thugs and $20/day parking? Anyway, they claimed that the surrounding counties all benefitted from the city's centeral presence, and therefore, the residents in those surrounding counties should be taxed. Some called it a "donut" tax, as those counties formed a ring around Allegheny County, which is where Pittsburgh is.
They will make up any reason if they think the sheeple will buy it
I was interested in what is actually on the ground as opposed to the reports that I have read so I took a virtual trip via Google Maps Street View. I was a little surprised to see some very well maintained neighborhoods that appeared to be occupied by homeowners that take pride in their places.
On the other hand, there are some neighborhoods that I didn't even feel safe touring though it was virtual.
I honestly feel bad for those who are at risk at losing a home that they truly care about and have to agree with you that the only answer is to diversify. The problem being the value in those neighborhoods that are still viable is exactly what the looters feed upon. The Looters won't be happy until there is nothing left. They are not concerned for their future and never have been. That is why they are in the position they are in.
Thanks for the ping. What a peaceful thread :)
Are you sure it's 'its'?
I’m not gonna take the bait. Not gonna do it...
Sorry, I couldn’t resist. I wasn’t around for yesterday’s grammar raid.
I missed it too - sounded like fun. The problem with the article is that its “it’s” were its distraction from its content. It’s not a bad thing, I suppose, that its “it’s” did that, but it isn’t that its “it’s” were its major issue, I would think. Is it, or isn’t it the case that its “it’s” were it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.