Posted on 07/16/2013 7:49:53 PM PDT by BunnySlippers
No. She’s the one married to a lawyer, and was the foremen. I don’t think she was dippy or an air head at all. What aggravates me in this statement is yes the death of a teenager weighed heavily on their heart but how about sending an innocent man to jail? That would be a bigger travesty.
Thank God there were three Not Guilty votes initially and they stayed strong to public and political.
Actually she didn’t sound dippy or stupid at all, what the hell interview were you watching. And I think it was worse that these four jurors released a statement like this because it makes it sound as if they don’t agree with their own verdict, because B37 came out strong in supporting GZ last night on AC.
She also never claimed to be speaking for anyone but herself.
They are in Fear and trying to blunt off the anger that was seen all over the web/TV for the juror of the CNN interview They did the right thing. The jury cannot decide on emotions nor for a social justice theory.
From what I saw, the juror was too emotional. One of those situations of “wait a week and then see how you feel”.
The problem is that she is the only one speaking and she is speaking about the others and what they felt and believed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.