Posted on 07/15/2013 7:29:28 PM PDT by marthemaria
Vereen has ties to the Scheme Team, but we knew that.
Other than than the difference between “er” a “a”, and Piers is a dolt, but we already knew that, too ... nothing new.
He had a stacked audience, cheering RJ on. The questions were leading, as if Vereen wrote the script.
Hopefully, her 15 minutes are up.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1307/15/pmt.01.html
Interview with Rachel Jeantel
FYI
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1307/15/acd.01.html
Exclusive Interview With Juror B-37; Defense Team Reacts to Juror Interview
COOPER: I want to ask you a bunch of the — I want to ask you about some of the different witnesses. Rachel Jeantel, the woman who was on the phone with Trayvon Martin at the start of the incident.
What did you make of her testimony?
JUROR: I didn’t think it was very credible, but I felt very sorry for her. She didn’t ask to be in this place. She didn’t ask — she wanted to go. She wanted to leave. She didn’t want to be any part of this jury. I think she felt inadequate toward everyone because of her education and her communication skills. I just felt sadness for her.
COOPER: You felt like, what, she was in over her head?
JUROR: Well, not over her head, she just didn’t want to be there, and she was embarrassed by being there, because of her education and her communication skills, that she just wasn’t a good witness. COOPER: Did you find it hard at times to understand what she was saying?
JUROR: A lot of the times because a lot of the time she was using phrases I have never heard before, and what they meant.
COOPER: When she used the phrase, “creepy ass cracker,” what did you think of that?
JUROR: I thought it was probably the truth. I think Trayvon probably said that.
COOPER: And did you see that as a negative statement or a racial statement as the defense suggested?
JUROR: I don’t think it’s really racial. I think it’s just everyday life, the type of life that they live, and how they’re living, in the environment that they’re living in.
COOPER: So you didn’t find her credible as a witness?
JUROR: No.
COOPER: So did you find her testimony important in terms of what she actually said?
JUROR: Well, I think the most important thing is the time that she was on the phone with Trayvon. So you basically, hopefully if she heard anything, she would say she did, but the time coincides with George’s statements and testimony of time limits and what had happened during that time.
COOPER: Explain that?
JUROR: Well, because there was a — George was on the 9-1-1 call while she was on the call with Trayvon, and the times coincide, and I think there was two minutes between when George hung up from his 9-1-1 call, to the time Trayvon and Rachel had hung up.
So really nothing could have happened because the 9-1-1 call would have heard the nonemergency call that George had called, heard something happening before that.
COOPER: She said at one point that she heard the sound of wet grass.
Did that seem believable to you?
JUROR: Well, everything was wet at that point. It was pouring down rain.
Did you notice any edits? Don’t think this was truly a live “performance “!
I didn’t notice any edits, but there could have been. It seemed quite scripted to me.
If she could read I’d have looked for a TelePrompTer
The idiots are literally running the asylum. This dumbass could not pour pee out of a boot with instructions written on the heel...LITERALLY, if the instructions were written in cursive, and yet the left looks at her as a bastion of all beauty, strength and integrity, and looks at a young white guy working on wall street as the epitome of evil.
We literally can’t live with these people.
Agreed, but so many of these kids don’t think, don’t have the ability to think or don’t think anyone else will stand up to their bully tactics.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.