Posted on 06/16/2013 5:30:22 AM PDT by Hotlanta Mike
They did before....so not news.
The straws on the camel’s back sure seem to be piling up.
The speed nobama and his comrades are pushing may bring us up to “that” wall before 2016.
A lot will depend on outcome of 2014. If dem/libs are able to fix that election, it might be the last in USA with 50, or is that 57, States.
“The congressmen on the Benghazi investigation should request the phone call between Hillary and Zero that night.”
Maybe Snowden was listening in. And that is why they are after him.
I still have yet to see any specific charges against Snowden. Britt Hume said the same thing today on Fox Sunday News. Jane Harmon disagreed but again nothing specific - just horrific cries of irreparable damage to the NSA.
....” just horrific cries of irreparable damage to the NSA.”...>
Destroy trust in a nations authorized security...you can take the nation.
I imagine they've completed their review of what materials Snowden copied and they are trying to get in front of the next batch of stories. The writer who interviewed him said this is just the beginning.
Great idea, I was for burning it down but “waste not want not” a phrase that is unknown in government.
Good question about which “law” he may have broken - more likely the doctrine that goes with a job that requires a security clearance. One must sing a non-disclosure agreement that leaves on open to prosecution if the non-disclosure is abrogated. NSA undoubtedly broke laws, but those in politics claim that while it may be construed as illegal, it also might not be termed “criminal. Go figure. I still maintain he did us a service.
Not until the same is done to those who consistently commit the same type acts. The government is betraying the trust of the People - I will defend Snowden before I defend them and go blindly along the path they would lead us on. How is it worse for a citizen to break the trust than for the government to do so?
It is not either / or. whoever breaks the law should be held accountable. In Snowden’s case I take it back. No last meal. Just shoot the SOB.
“This isn’t “monitoring.” This isn’t “scanning.” This is eavesdropping — exactly what President Obama denied when he said “Nobody is listening to your phone calls.” Oh, yes they are, Barry, and lying about it is about the most egregious breach of trust with the American people that has occurred in your administration.”
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2013/06/oh_yes_they_are_listening_to_our_phone_calls_barry.html#ixzz2WPA0etEs
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
1s and 0s, 1s and 0s, 1s and 0s, 1s and 0s, 1s and 0s
So many things to keep track of which shall we watch? The 1s or the 0s
Bingo, it isn't about National Security, it is about winning elections. They now have enough Data on individual voters in key districts to tailor the outcome. If that doesn't work they will just steal the elections with fraudulent voting machine tabulations.
I have suspected for years that polling is designed to prepare us for the outcome, not predicting the outcome.
Anyone that thinks the Chinese that make virtually all our computer hardware hasn't built back doors into our systems is a little naive.
They have stolen most of our military designs (at least the one they couldn't buy from Bill and co.) and it is evident if you look at their latest hardware. A lot cheaper to build F22 Raptors if you just build from proven plans.
But Obama’s mouthpiece claimed yesterday that Obama does not believe Americans privacy has been violated.
I think 2 prison cells should be built right in the middle of this project with a porta pottey,and the 2 inmates should be Eric Holder and Hussein Obama,they should be provided with a hammer and screwdriver and be told when you are finished building this place you can go back to Kenya
” they are trying to get in front of the next batch of stories “ ... i.e. invent a new batch of lies and stick to it.
Perfect - I can assume that if they decide that the 2nd Amendment is not necessary and outlaw guns, you will turn yours in and point out those who still have them so they can be prosecuted under "the law".
When the law protects the bad guys from the People, the law is not valid...period.
And what will come out once his cold lifeless hand drops off the dead man's switch? He's no dummy, he has to have planned for this eventuality.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.